A Comparative Study on Arms and Armor in East Asia -Mainly on Outfits for Cavalrymen -

古方时期的兵器和盔甲相互影响、相互影响。通过与朝鲜和中国出土的武器和盔甲进行比较，可以得出结论：5世纪下半叶出现在日本的武器和盔甲基本上是骑兵的装备，它们不是作为单独的材料引入的，而是作为装备引入的。特别是重骑兵的服装，不仅是男人穿的，也是马穿的，四世纪的服装在中国被发掘出来，并通过高句丽的方式，在第五世纪初出现在朝鲜半岛的南端，在五世纪末出现在日本，出现在每个世纪的不同时间。但在日本，重型骑兵的装备并不普遍，这似乎表明，使用他们进行战斗的优势和必要性无法得到承认。原因可能是防御设施的位置和结构以及…的方式不同更多的是日本与其他国家之间的战斗。朝鲜的装甲大致可分为三种-朝鲜式、中国北方式和日本式。在这三种装甲中，中国北方风格的装甲在朝鲜普遍流行，这种装甲是重型骑兵的装备。4世纪和5世纪从新罗地区到加亚地区东部和南部出土韩式盔甲，5世纪主要在加亚地区南部和西部出土日式盔甲，白切地区也有日式盔甲出土。在日本，发现了鳞甲，即中国北方风格的盔甲，但没有发现韩式盔甲。这些现象似乎反映了当时新罗、白切、嘎雅之间的关系及其与日本的交流。对它们的研究表明，它们的出现与弥合时期的伊藤次型盔甲有一定的关系，似乎与中国长江中游战国墓葬出土的漆皮盔甲有关。第四世纪下半叶出土的带框铜器的出现与弥合和古方时期出土的库里努基式盔甲有关。较少

Arms and armor in Kofun period changed interacting each other. By comparing them with those excavated in Korea and China, it can be concluded that the arms and armor which appeared in the second quarter of the fifth century in Japan were fundamentally outfits for cavalrymen, and they were introduced not as separate materials, but as outfits. Particularly as for outfits of heavy cavalrymen, which were worn not only by men but also by horses, the fourth century outfits were excavated in China, and by way of Koguryo, they appeared in the southern tip of Korea Peninsula in the beginning of the fifth country, and in Japan at the end of the fifth century, appearing at different time in each century. But in Japan, outfits of heavy cavalrymen were scarcely prevalent, which seems to show that the advantage and the necessity of the fight using them couldn't be recognized. The reason for this might be that there were differences in the places and structures of defensive facilities and in the way … More of fighting between Japan and the other countries.The armor in Korea can be roughly divided into three - Korean style, Chinese northern style, and Japanese style. Among these three, Chinese northern style armor, which were outfits of heavy cavalrymen, prevailed universally in Korea. While Korean style armor were excavated from Silla region to the eastern and southern parts of Gaya region in the fourth and the fifth century, Japanese style armor were excavated mainly in the southern and western parts of Gaya region in the fifth century and were also found in Paekche region. In Japan, scale armor, that is Chinese northern style armor, were discovered, but Korean style armor weren't. These phenomena seem to reflect a part of the relationships among Silla, Paekche, and Gaya in those days and their exchanges with Japan.Concerning iron cuirasses in Kofun period, the number of excavated cuirasses which were made of organic materials has increased recently. The study of them leads to the conclusion that their appearance has some relation to Itatoji-type armor in Yayoi period which seem to have something to do with lacquered leather armor excavated from tombs of Warring States period in the middle Changjiang area in China.It is also concluded that the appearance of the cuirasses with frames in the last quarter of the fourth century has relation to kurinuki-type armor excavated in Yayoi and Kofun periods. Less