A Comparative Study on Arms and Armor in East Asia

东亚武器甲胄比较研究

• 批准号: 16520478
• 负责人: KOBAYASHI Ken'ichi
• 金额: $ 2.43万
• 依托单位: National Research Institute Cultural Properties, Nara
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2004
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2004 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16520478/
• 关键词: outfits of cavalrymen; full outfits of cavalrymen; armor; armor of horse; helmet of horse; 挂甲; 可動綴; 高句麗; 壁画; 防禦施設; 鎧甲; 固定綴; 甲冑; 馬具

By comparing the data of the arms and armor excavated in the Japanese Islands, the South Korean peninsula, and China, the data which shows the exchange between these areas became clear. On the other hand, the existence of the data which is characteristic of each area and shows the originality of that area also became clear.In the Japanese Islands, since the Yayoi period, offensive weapons including bows and arrows and defensive implements such as armor had changed, affecting each other. In the middle of the 5th century, the new offensive weapons and defensive implements were introduced simultaneously. These were fundamentally outfits of cavalrymen and it became clear that they were brought into the Japanese Islands from the northeast area in China and Koguryo via the South Korean peninsula. The outfits of heavy cavalrymen in which the horse wore armor materialized in the northeast area in China in the 4th century were excavated also at the South Korean peninsula southernmost end, and i … More t can be confirmed that both are the same genealogy. However, in the Japanese Islands, since excavations of the armor and the helmet of a horse are very rare, it is thought that full outfits of cavalrymen hardly spread.This situation shows that outfits of cavalrymen were not introduced together with the cavalry battle, but that they were taken in as new-type arms and armor with higher performance. Full outfits of cavalrymen were not needed in the Japanese Islands of those days. The difference of the armaments in various regions of East Asia was also a difference of the battle method.Furthermore, as for defensive facilities, the rampart drawn on the mural painting of the Koguryo ancient tomb and the high bulwark involving a ground castle have not been discovered in the Japanese Islands. These facts make it possible to think that arms and armor were prepared as equipment for the battle in the Japanese Islands. In addition, as for the horse, there is a fact that horse implements were introduced earlier than outfits of cavalrymen. Therefore it will be necessary to take into consideration that selection was made in order to accept things which were required at the time. Less

通过对比日本群岛、韩国半岛和中国出土的武器装甲数据，可以清楚地看到这些地区之间的交流。另一方面，各具特色、显示该地区独创性的数据的存在也变得清晰起来。在日本群岛，自弥生时期以来，包括弓箭在内的进攻性武器与盔甲等防御性工具发生了变化，相互影响。5世纪中叶，新的进攻性武器和防御工具同时问世。这些基本上是骑兵的装备，很明显，他们是从东北部的中国和高句丽地区经由韩国半岛进入日本群岛的。4世纪中国东北地区出土的穿着盔甲的重骑兵服装也是在韩国半岛最南端出土的，I…更多的人可以确认这两个人是同一个家谱。然而，在日本群岛，由于出土的盔甲和马盔非常罕见，人们认为骑兵的全套装备几乎没有铺开。这种情况表明，骑兵的装备并不是与骑兵战斗一起引入的，而是作为性能更高的新型武器和装甲而被引入的。在那个时代，日本群岛不需要全副武装的骑兵。东亚各地区武器装备的不同，也是作战方法的不同。此外，在防御设施方面，高句丽古墓壁画上的堡垒和地面城堡的高耸堡垒，在日本群岛上都没有发现。这些事实使人们有可能认为，武器和装甲是为日本群岛的战斗准备的装备。此外，关于马，还有一个事实，即马器的引入早于骑兵的装备。因此，必须考虑到作出选择是为了接受当时所需要的东西。较少

项目成果

東アジアにおける甲胄の系譜をめぐって

关于东亚脚背的谱系

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 東アジア考古学論叢
• 作者: 右代啓視;鈴木琢也ほか;Hiroshi USHIRO;Hiroshi USHIRO;右代啓視;右代 啓視;鈴木琢也・右代啓視;鈴木琢也;takuya SUZUKI;右代啓視;Hiroshi USHIRO;右代啓視;右代啓視;Takuya SUZUKI;右代啓視(共著);右代啓視(共著);Hayashi Noboru;Hayashi Noboru;林 上;Hayashi Noboru;林 上;Hayashi Noboru;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;MATSUO Nobuhiro;小澤 毅;Ozawa Tsuyoshi;高橋 克壽;小 林 謙 一
• 通讯作者: 小 林 謙 一

On the Genealogy of the Armor in East Asia

论东亚铠甲的谱系

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: Collected Papers of East Asian Archaeology
• 作者: 右代啓視;鈴木琢也ほか;Hiroshi USHIRO;Hiroshi USHIRO;右代啓視;右代 啓視;鈴木琢也・右代啓視;鈴木琢也;takuya SUZUKI;右代啓視;Hiroshi USHIRO;右代啓視;右代啓視;Takuya SUZUKI;右代啓視(共著);右代啓視(共著);Hayashi Noboru;Hayashi Noboru;林 上;Hayashi Noboru;林 上;Hayashi Noboru;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;松尾信裕;MATSUO Nobuhiro;小澤 毅;Ozawa Tsuyoshi;高橋 克壽;小 林 謙 一;KOBAYASHI Ken'ichi
• 通讯作者: KOBAYASHI Ken'ichi