Study on the interrelationship and the social change of Ancient Korea and Japan from the view of burial goods

为探讨朝鲜三国与日本的相互关系，建立古年代学刻不容缓。根据考古学家的估计，现在我们有很大的差距。为了解决这个问题，我比较了墓葬中出土的陶器，研究了它们的类型学变化。在这样做之后，我有了共同的基础，以确定每个墓丘和陪葬品的年代。在准备过程中，我首先以三国为对照，研究了日本古坟时代的起源。我强烈指出，日本对韩国的影响不亚于中国。在与中国的特殊关系上，日本的建国比韩国更为突兀。当时探戈和日本沿海的其他地区起了很大的作用。直到20世纪中叶，加耶和北九州地区一直是韩国和日本的互动轴心。但在同一时间，另一场溃败开始集中在百济和Higo地区之间。我们从墓室的反面得知这一点。从朝鲜半岛各个王国的陪葬品语料库中，我可以发现一些重要的观点。20世纪前、中期，在韩国和日本，同时发生了一次大的金属加工变革。在上世纪60年代，中国出现了新一波名牌商品，并建立了新秩序。

It is urgent to build up the ancient chronology to discuss about the interrelationship between Korea three kingdoms and Japan. Now we have wide gaps of he estimated dates according to archaeologists. To resolve it, I compared the pottery from burial mounds and study the typological changes. After doing so, I have got the common base to date each burial mounds and burial goods.On this preparation, I first researched the starting of the Japanese Kofun period in the contrast of the three kingdoms of Korea. I strongly pointed out that Japan had big effect from Korea no less than from China. The Japan state formation was more abrupt than Korea on behalf of the special relationship with China. At that time Tango and other districts on the Japanese sea coast played a great role. Until the mid 5^<th> century, Kaya and the northern Kyusyu district was an axis of interaction of Korea and Japan. But after the same time another rout began to be focused between Baekje and Higo district.. We Know it from the contrary of burial chambers.On the corpus of burial goods of each kingdom in the Korean peninsula, I could find out some important points. An big metal work's change occurred all at once in the former and mid 5^<th> century both in Korea and in Japan. And in the former 6^<th> century, new wave of prestige goods appeared and the new order was builty by China.