Explications of the Significance of Heidegger's Phibsophy for Contemporary Philosophy and Human Sciences

本研究以海德格尔在盛、时时期的早期思想为中心，阐述了海德格尔哲学对包括分析哲学在内的当代哲学和包括认知科学在内的当代人文科学的意义。在论文《海德格尔与表征主义》（UTCP Bulletin，第1期）中，我认为，连接主义所倡导的新版本的表征主义的引入，并没有给海德格尔认为是人类日常认知基础的“存在于世界”的反表征概念带来重大改变。我在《本体论、实用主义与技术》（Shiso，第974期）一文中指出，与杜威的自然主义实用主义相比，海德格尔的实用主义阐述了一种完全不同的偶然性概念。基于这一差异，我展示了实用主义中的技术理论与后来海德格尔的技术理论的不同之处，以及海德格尔的技术理论如何优于哈贝马斯的理论。对海德格尔实用主义与技术理论的阐释，也使我们有可能厘清一些基本概念，而这些概念是重建海德格尔作为语境的“社会”理论所必需的。

This research, which focuses on the early thought of Heidegger in the period of Sein and Zeit, explicates what significance Heidegger's philosophy has for contemporary philosophy including analytic philosophy and contemporary human sciences including cognitive scienceThere are two main points in the results of the research.1.In the paper "Heidegger and Representationalism" (UTCP Bulletin, Vol.1), I argue that the introduction of a new version of representationalim as has been advocated by connectionism brings about no significant change of the anti-representational concept of "Being-in-the-world" that Heidegger considered to be fundamental for human everyday cognition.2.In the paper "Ontology, Pragmatism, and Technology" (Shiso, No.974), I claim that, compared with Dewey's naturalistic pragmatism, Heidegger's pragmatism elaborates a completely different concept of contingency. Based on this difference, I show how the theory of technology in pragmatism differs from that of later Heidegger, and how Heidegger's theory of technology has the advantage over Habermas' theory. The elucidation of Heidegger's theory on pragmatism and technology makes it also possible to make clear some basic concepts that are necessary for reconstructing his theory of "society" as context.