Comparative study of legal aid and advice between England and Japan

1.作者根据基本统计资料、《实施后审查：获取剖析》和其他材料，审查了在英格兰和威尔士引入社区法律服务的效果。作者审查了日本法律援助的现状，特别是在富岛区、东京和长野县。作者审查了富岛区、东京和长野市的一般法律咨询。作者审查了日本消费者的法律咨询，特别是富岛区、东京和长野县。作者审查了长野县司法书记提供的法律咨询。作者分析了英格兰和威尔士郡法院案件的最新趋势。7 .作者对最近日本关于ADR法制定的争论进行了讨论，认为该法案的制定可能是对传统纠纷管理机制的复制和强化，这与法治理想不一致。笔者提出日本的法律援助和咨询新方案“Shiho -net”（法律服务网）应借鉴英国和威尔士的经验和实验，特别是社区法律服务伙伴关系的方案和思路以及社区法律服务中转诊网络和路标方案的构建和形成。

1.The author examined the effects of the introduction of Community legal Service in England and Wales, based upon basic statistics, Post-Implementation Review An Anatomy of Access : and other materials.2.The author examined the present situation of legal aid in Japan, especially in Toshima-ku, Tokyo and Nagano prefecture.3.The author examined general legal advice in Toshima-ku, Tokyo and Nagano city.4.The author examined legal advice for consumers in Japan, especially Toshima-ku, Tokyo and Nagano prefecture.5.The author examined legal advice by judicial scriveners in Nagano prefecture.6.The author analyzed recent trends of cases in the county courts in England and Wales.7.The author discussed recent debates on the enactment of the ADR Act in Japan and suggested the enactment may reproduce and reinforce the traditional dispute management mechanism, which should be inconsistent with the ideal of Rule of Law.8.The author proposed the new Japanese scheme of legal aid and advice called Shiho -net (Legal Services Network) should learn from the experience and experiments in England and Wales, especially the scheme and ideas of Community Legal Service Partnership and construction and formation of referral networks and signposting scheme in the Community legal Service.