A study of the oneself and others recognition of the East Asia in 18-19 centuries

近代以来的历史文本以某种方式倾向于关注自己的国家。这些描绘了这个国家的特征和文化特征。考虑以下几点也很重要：这不是前现代时代的现象；这是一种记录现代历史的方法；这一特点并不只存在于日本。在德国和法国，每个国家都有不同的历史学家描绘历史的方法。尽管如此，欧洲还是创造了一种风格，把历史描绘成一组独特的东西，为自己的国家制定了范式。因此，我们需要认识到，自近代以来，我们是如何习惯于用自己国家的鲜明特征粉饰历史的历史文本的，这是不言而喻的。因此，为了考虑研究的基本原理，我觉得我们必须设置一个起点，重视“同时性”和“同步性”的观点。也就是说，由于一个国家的历史只讨论该国的特点，因此在实现一个包含不同国家之间共同点的观点时，以相反的观点为目标是重要的。要做到这一点，重要的是要开始讨论，至少我们可以通过跨越国界来达成哪些信条或原则。我们必须认识到尊重相互民族、人权与和平的重要性。历史。

Somehow or another historical texts since the modern period tend to focus on one's country. These depict the country's features and cultural identity. It's also important to consider the following: this isn't a phenomenon of the pre-modern era; it's a method of documentation characteristic of modern historical accounts; and it's a feature not just found in Japan. In Germany and France, each country has distinct and different methods by which historians portray history. Still, Europe created the style of depicting history as a set of peculiarities that formulate the paradigm for one's own country. We thus need to reach an understanding that it is self-evident in how we have been accustomed since modern times to historical texts that have been whitewashed with history of distinct characteristics of one's own country. Therefore, in order to consider the fundamentals of the study, I feel that we have to set a starting point that places importance on viewpoints of "simultaneity" and "synchronicity". That is, since a national history only discusses features characteristic of that country, it would be important to aim for the opposite in achieving a perspective that incorporates commonalities among different countries. To do so, it is important to start discussing at least what tenets or principles we can arrive at by crossing over national boundaries. We must recognize the importance of respecting mutual nationalities, human rights, and peace. histories.