Rethinking European history under Queer History

我分析了“男子气概”的建构过程和“同性恋”在德国近代史上的历史功能。分析表明，从其他角度重新思考异性恋解读的历史是很重要的。然后，把这本书《男女同性恋史上的名人录》（Who’s Who in Gay and Lesbian History, London, 2001）从英语翻译成日语，我发现这些特点反映了每个时代——古代、中世纪、现代。然后，2009年我参加的日本酷儿研究协会（JAQS）和日本性别认同障碍协会让我不仅从历史上，而且从社会学，临床心理学和精神病学上了解了关于性的新知识。因此，很明显，我们应该分析构建“同性恋”的社会和政治过程。“同性恋”本身没有问题。在这些研究的基础上，我可以理解“性”，换句话说，“关系”或“歧视制度”是如何在欧洲历史的背景下构建的。

I analyzed the constructed process of 'masculinity' and the historical function of 'homosexuality' in Modern German history. Analysis showed that it was important that the history interpreted by heterosexual was rethought with other points of view.Then, Transtalating the book, Who's Who in Gay and Lesbian History, London, 2001 from English into Japanese, I found that the charactaristics reflected each times-ancient times, medieval age, modern times. Then, The Japan Association for Queer Studies(JAQS) and Japanese Society of Gender Identity Disorder which I participated in 2009 showed me the new knowladge from not only history but also sociology, clinical psychology and psychiatry about sexuality. As a result, it was cleared that we should analyze the social and potlitical process which constructed 'homosexuality'. 'Homosexuality' itself didn't have a problem.On the basis of these researches, I could understand how was 'sexuality', in other words, 'relationship' or 'systems of discrimination' constructed in the context of European histroy.