Theoretical, practical and law-comparative research on the new tendency of the environmental law and the environmental policy

从我们对东京日德联合研讨会（1998年4月）的筹备研究中，研讨会本身和我们对弗莱堡第二次联合研讨会（2000年9月）的筹备研究得出以下结论：德国和日本在传统宪法框架内处理科学技术发展对环境的破坏，即：首先是在宪法中引入新的环境保护条款作为国家目标（德国），或者提出环境权作为生存权（第25条）或追求幸福权（第13条）的衍生品（日本），其次是通过制定大量的宪法具体化法律和条例，第三是发展与这些法律和条例相适应的行政和司法。但是，传统的框架是不够的，以解决环境问题的以下…更多的理由。必须采取预防和综合措施，而不是事后和个别补救措施。B.不仅需要解决这一代人的问题，也需要考虑子孙后代。C.由于行政和法律专家在这一问题上的无能，专家参与科学技术的必要性。D.由于单个国家解决问题的能力不足，所有国家进行全球合作的必要性。因此，修改宪法思维框架是必要的。首先，必须把宪法看作是国家为人民的生存利益采取一切必要措施的法律规范体系，而不是限制国家权力的法律规范体系。其次，宪法必须被视为组织所有制度和非制度因素参与和合作以实现国家任务的法律规范体系，而不是仅仅统治国家活动的法律规范体系。少

From our preparative study for the Japanese-German joint symposium in Tokyo(April 1998), the symposium itself and our preparative study for the second joint symposium in Freiburg (September 2000) results following learning :The state both in Germany and Japan hat dealt with the destruction of the environment as the result of development of science and technologie within the traditional framework of the constitution, namely, firstly by introducing of new article of environmental protection as the state goal in the constitution (Germany) or by proposing of environmental right as the derivative from the right to live (article 25) or from the right to pursuit of happiness (article 13) or from both (Japan) secondarily by enacting of lots of the constitution concretizing laws and ordinances, thirdly by developing the administration and the judicature conformed to those laws and ordinances. But the traditional framework is not enough to the solution of the problem of the environment by follow … More ing grounds. a necessity of preventive and comprehensive measures, instead of post-factum and individual remedies. b. necessesity of not only solution for present generation, but also of consideration for future generation. c. necessity of participation of experts in science and technology on account of inability of experts of administration and law in this problem. d. necessity of the global cooperation of all states on account of insuffuiciency of solution by a individual state. Theore the revision of framework of thinking on the constitution is necessary. Firstly the constitution must be thought rather as the legal norm-system that obliges the state to take all necessary measures for the existential interest of people than as the legal norm-system of limitation of state power. Secondarily the constitution must be thought rather as the legal norm-system that organized the participation and the cooperation of all institutional and non-institutional factors for realization of tasks of state than as the legal norm-system that rules only state activities. Less