Investigating and mobilising peace and trust for sustainable development via the UK's international Rights for Time Research Network

“时间换权利”研究网络将研究和平、信任与人权之间的关系，特别是在人道主义保护的法律、政策和治理方面，并分享经验。这项工作将在五个国家进行，包括肯尼亚、卢旺达、约旦、巴勒斯坦和黎巴嫩。我们的重点是从基层社区的角度，对政府机构的信任和不信任的看法、概念和星座。目的是在我们的每个案例研究背景下，调查短期人道主义危机干预在煽动政府机构不信任方面的驱动因素和后果；促进雄心勃勃的案例研究，比较人道主义保护失败对公民和社区对政府机构的不信任所产生的影响；并利用跨案例研究背景的深入比较，将研究结果整合起来，以增进对边缘化群体经历风险和复原力的方式的理解，从而加强对人权的尊重，促进和平。该项目调查了短期人道主义危机干预在每个案例研究背景下引发政府机构不信任的驱动因素和后果。研究结果将被比较和整合，以描述人道主义保护失败的影响，以及他如何在公民和社区中支撑对政府机构的不信任。调查结果将被整合，以增进我们对边缘化群体经历风险和复原力的方式的理解，从而加强对人权的尊重并促进和平。这些目标将通过“权利为时代”网络调查人员和合作伙伴正在进行的社区主导的案例研究项目来实现。这些项目调查了卢旺达、肯尼亚、约旦、黎巴嫩和巴勒斯坦现有人道主义“保护”危机框架的缺陷。拟议的研究将通过促进跨学科和跨背景的对话和合作，超越以领域为重点的探索，为我们现有的工作增加价值并带来创新。这将扩大现有的协同效应以及网络的总体影响和产出，特别是在加强包容性和平与复原力方面，并有助于增进对信任和全球治理的了解。

The Rights for Time Research Network will study the relationship between peace, trust, and human rights, particularly with respect to law, policy and governance in humanitarian protection, and share learning. The work will be conducted five countries, including Kenya, Rwanda, Jordan, Palestine, and Lebanon. Our focus in on the perceptions, conceptions and constellations of trust and mistrust in government institutions from the perspective of grassroots communities in and across our regions of focus. The aims are to investigate the drivers and consequences of short-term humanitarian crisis interventions in fomenting mistrust in government institutions in each of our case study contexts; foster ambitious case study comparisons of the felt implications of failed humanitarian protection in relation to mistrust in government institutions among citizens and communities; and draw upon the deep comparisons across case study contexts and integrate the findings to improve understandings of the ways in which marginalised groups experience risk and resilience to increase respect for human rights and advance peace.The project investigates the drivers and consequences of short term humanitarian crisis interventions in fomenting mistrust in government institutions in each of our case study contexts. The results will be compared and integrated to describe implications of failed humanitarian protection and how his underpins mistrust in government institutions among citizens and communities. The findings will be integrated to increase our understanding of the ways in which marginalised groups experience risk and resilience to increase respect for human rights and advance peace.The objectives will be achieved through ongoing community-led case study research projects being conducted by Rights for Times Network investigators and partners. The projects investigate the shortcomings of existing crisis frameworks of humanitarian 'protection' in Rwanda, Kenya, Jordan, Lebanon, and Palestine. The proposed research will add value and bring innovation to our existing work by facilitating interdisciplinary and cross-context conversations and collaborations beyond area-focused explorations. This will amplify existing synergies and the overall impact and outputs of the Network, particularly in relation to strengthening inclusive peace and resilience, and contribute to advancing knowledge about trust and global governance.