Local Acc Fund 21 Children, Learning and Inclusive Places (CLIP)

格拉斯哥大学（UOG）和贝尔法斯特女王大学（QUB）是研究主导型社区参与的机构战略的早期采用者，重点是通过苏格兰儿童社区（CNS）和女王社区和地方（QCAP）解决持久的经济和社会挑战。我们一直分别在格拉斯哥的特定社区和其他贫困人口高度集中的地区以及贝尔法斯特开展工作，并在过去的12个月里制定了关于儿童和环境的试点项目。这项名为“儿童学习和包容场所”（CLIP）的工作计划旨在反思我们在地方合作生产方面的经验，以便加强我们与当前和未来社区合作伙伴的研究和发展工作，并对其产生影响。虽然我们在不同的领域分别开展工作，但我们对“能力”以及如何通过参与性研究提供信息的干预措施在最贫困的社区建立更具包容性和地方主导的战略有着共同的概念关注。跨大学申请的价值在于：它汇集了不同的学术专业；不同的政策、体制和监管制度；一系列协同设计方法和影响策略；根植于特定地方的日常经历和生活在那里的孩子们。该工作计划将：反思社区合作生产与我们整个案例社区的循证政策影响之间的联系；识别障碍和潜在的有效影响；建立和测试有效的实践，以支持参与性研究；并帮助指导我们对儿童、地点和环境的计划研究。简而言之，我们认为这种伙伴关系有助于最大限度地发挥我们工作方案的影响；与此同时，在上游建立影响，进入我们对环境，地方和儿童生活的共同关注。CNS和社会与教育公平网络（NSEE）在智利建立了一个研究实践伙伴关系，利用CNS开发的能力方法，扩大儿童在气候变化讨论中的声音和作用。这表明他们在环境问题上的声音是多么的没有被充分代表，但也表明儿童和年轻人的反应是积极参与和明确的。同样，昆士兰大学在贝尔法斯特市场地区进行的社区调查强调了污染、汽车拥堵和停车以及废弃场地的利用不足，这是当地再生的关键优先事项之一。通过评估我们在儿童和场所方面的工作，我们的目标是将合作生产置于研究影响辩论的核心，并反映出我们在该提案中的目标是测试我们关于儿童，场所和环境之间关系的概念和想法。

The University of Glasgow (UOG) and Queen's University Belfast (QUB) have been early adopters of institutional strategies for research-led community engagement focused on addressing enduring economic and social challenges, through Children's Neighbourhood Scotland (CNS) and Queen's Communities and Place (QCAP). We have been working separately in specific communities in Glasgow, and other areas with high concentrations of poverty, and Belfast and over the last 12 months have developed pilot place-based programmes on children and the environment. The aim of this programme of work, Children Learning and Inclusive Places (CLIP) is to reflect on our experience of place-based co-production in order to both strengthen and build impact into our research and developmental work with our current and with future community partners. Whilst we have worked separately in different areas, we share a conceptual concern for 'capabilities' and how interventions, informed by participatory research, can build more inclusive and locally owned strategies in even the most deprived communities. The value of the inter-university application is that: it brings together separate academic specialisms; different policy, institutional and regulatory regimes; a range of co-design methodologies and impact strategies; and rootedness in the everyday experiences of specific places and the children who live there. This programme of work will: reflect on the connection between community co-production and evidence-based policy impact across our case communities; identify barriers and potential in effective impact; build and test effective practices to support participatory research; and help direct our planned research on children, place and the environment. In short, we see this partnership helping to maximise the impact of our programmes of work; and at the same time build impact, upstream, into our shared concern for environment, place and children's lives. CNS and the Network for Social and Educational Equity (NSEE) have a Research Practice Partnership Chile in using the capabilities approach developed by CNS to amplify children's voices and their agency in the climate change discussion. This showed how underrepresented their voice is on the environment but also the engaged and articulated nature of the responses across children and young people. Similarly, the community survey in the Market area of Belfast, carried out by QUB, highlighted pollution, car congestion and parking and the under use of derelict sites as one of their key priorities in local regeneration. By evaluating our work with children and place we aim to put co-production at the heart of the research impact debate and, as well as reflecting we aim in this proposal to test out our concepts and ideas on this relationship between children, place and the environment.