A Critique of Ethical Approaches to Conflict

价值观冲突是现代政治不可避免的一部分。在面对这些挑战时，我们应该力求达成共识还是妥协，还是两者都不？支撑我的研究项目的诊断是，无论是冲突解决还是冲突遏制方法都不能为这个问题提供令人满意的答案。原因在于，这两种方法都不是基于现象学分析，即揭示我们实际处理的不同价值冲突的范围;相反，每种方法都（错误地）规定所有价值冲突都符合特定的模式。为了说明这一点，我想对现实世界中的价值冲突实例进行现象学分析。我的主张是，只有在对不同类型的价值冲突以及参与其中的人如何经历这些冲突的更深入理解的基础上，我们才能对上述问题产生合理的答案。五、工作时间表0 - 6月：研究和写作（a）介绍CC和CR;（B）批判性文献综述;（c）修订项目大纲7 - 15：冲突类型的现象学分析，从棘手的价值冲突开始，走向更易管理的价值冲突16 - 18：完成现象学部分19 - 24：将现象学分析应用于冲突策略25 - 27：完成应用部分28 - 30：完成最后一章和完整的草案30 - 36：修改完整的草案并提交

Conflicts over values are an inevitable part of modern polities. Should we aim at consensus or compromise or neither when confronted with them? The diagnosis underpinning my research project is that neither Conflict Resolution nor Conflict Containment approaches provide satisfactory answers to this question. The reason for this is that both approaches are not based on a phenomenological analysis that brings out the range of different value conflicts we are actually dealing with; instead, each approach (wrongly) stipulates that all value conflicts fit a particular mold. In order to show this, I want to provide a phenomenological analysis of real-world instances of value conflicts. My claim is that only on the basis of such deeper understanding of the different kinds of value conflicts and how they are experienced by those involved in them, we can generate sound answers to the question raised above.V. Schedule of WorkMonths 0 - 6: Research and writing (a) Introduction to CC and CR; (b) Critical literature review; and (c) revised Project Outline7 - 15: Phenomenological analysis of conflict types, starting from intractable value conflicts moving towards more manageable value conflicts16 - 18: Completion of the phenomenology section19 - 24: Application of phenomenological analysis to strategies to conflict25 - 27: Completion of the application section28 - 30: Completion of a concluding chapter and a full draft30 - 36: Revising the full draft and submission