Variations in attachment of meaning to votes through space: how inequalities impact voting behaviour.

新自由主义目前正处于危机之中，它在金融危机后的生存引发了一系列问题，特别是考虑到西方社会不平等的同时增长。通过使用空间和地点来研究政治，经济和社会不平等，可以深入了解这些不平等如何体现选举行为和对投票的意义的重视，这可能会挑战现有的流行叙事。研究将建立在现有的关于新自由主义与不平等，民粹主义，缺席，通过对开源、地理、社会经济数据进行空间和统计分析，结合定性分析，探讨以下主题：（贫困、就业、教育、收入、整个LSOAs的人口变化）影响政治参与;这些不平等如何影响政治态度;- 这些不平等如何影响投票的意义的附件，以及这是如何在英国的邻里之间变化的。通过使用空间分析方法来检查选举变量，并通过将这些观察结果与不同的空间历史联系起来，更广泛的投票模式的令人信服的解释变得显而易见。

Neoliberalism is currently in crisis, and its survival post-financial crisis has raised a number of questions, particularly considering the concurrent growth of inequality in occidental societies. By using space and place to study political, economic, and social inequalities, insights can be developed regarding how these inequalities manifest electoral behaviours and the attachment of meaning to votes, potentially challenging existing popular narratives.The research will build upon existing literature on neoliberalism's theorised relationship with inequalities, populism, absenteeism, and recent election outcomes by conducting spatial and statistical analysis on open-source, geographic, socioeconomic data in conjunction with qualitative analysis, to explore the following themes:- How socioeconomic, spatial inequalities (deprivation, employment, education, income, population change across LSOAs) impact political participation;- How these inequalities impact political attitudes;- How these inequalities affect the attachment of meaning to votes, and how this varies across neighbourhoods in the UK.By using spatial-analytical methods to examine electoral variables and by linking these observations to different spatial histories, convincing explanations of wider voting patterns become apparent.