课题基金 / 基金详情

Reimbursement and Intensity of Dentists' Training

Reimbursement and Intensity of Dentists' Training
牙医培训的报销和强度
批准号:
6805684
负责人:
MARGARET MARY WALSH
金额:
$48.56万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2003
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2003-09-30 至 2008-06-30

项目摘要

项目成果

MARGARET MARY WALSH的其他基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
描述(申请人提供):这项拟议的研究是一项随机对照试验,旨在确定培训强度和第三方报销对办公室普通牙医与其患者的烟草使用评估和治疗相关的知识、态度和行为的有效性。250家牙科诊所将从加州、亚利桑那州和内华达州所有执业会员和非会员普通牙医的美国牙科协会维护的总名单中随机抽取(按州分层)。由于自愿参加戒烟治疗强化培训的牙医可能不能代表人群中提供常规护理的牙医,我们将从初始牙科实践样本中随机选择20%作为研究的常规护理对照。剩下的80%将加入这项研究的干预部门。干预牙医将被随机分配到四组中的一组:(1)低强度培训,(2)低强度培训+第三方报销,(3)高强度培训,或(4)高强度培训+第三方报销(即,强度×报销的2x2析因设计)。常规护理对照组牙医将不接受任何干预。在基线和干预后9个月,所有研究牙医都将完成自填式问卷,了解他们对患者烟草使用的评估和治疗的知识、态度和行为。此外,在干预后9个月,患者对牙医在目标就诊时的行为的报告将在电话采访中进行评估,对患者的分组分配视而不见。届时,患者还将在这些目标就诊中报告遵守牙医建议的情况。主要的结果衡量标准将是患者在电话采访中对牙医在与烟草使用评估和治疗有关的目标就诊时的行为的报告。聚集在提供者内的患者报告将在具有强度、报销和强度x报销系数的广义估计方程(GEE)模型的组之间进行比较。初步分析将基于四个干预部门之间的意向治疗原则。二次分析将包括与普通护理组的比较。
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The proposed study is a randomized, controlled trial to determine the efficacy of training intensity and of third party reimbursement on office-based, general dentists' knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to the assessment and treatment of their patients' tobacco use. Two hundred and fifty dental practices will be randomly selected from a random sample (stratified by state) obtained from a master list maintained by the American Dental Association of all practicing member and nonmember general dentists in California, Arizona, and Nevada. Because dentists who volunteer to possibly be randomized to a group requiring intense training on tobacco cessation treatment may not be representative of dentists providing usual care in the population, we will randomly select 20% of our initial sample of dental practices for a usual-care-comparison arm of the study. The remaining 80% will be enrolled in the intervention arms of the study. Intervention dentists will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) low-intensity training, (2) low-intensity training plus third-party reimbursement, (3) high-intensity training, or (4) high-intensity training plus third-party reimbursement (i.e., a 2x2 factorial design of intensity x reimbursement). Usual care comparison group dentists will receive no intervention. At baseline and at nine months post intervention, all study dentists will complete self-administered questionnaires on their knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to their assessment and treatment of their patients' tobacco use. Also, at 9-months post-intervention, patient reports of dentists' behavior at target visits will be assessed during telephone interviews, blinded to patients' group assignment. At that time, patients will also report of compliance with dentists' recommendations at those target visits. The primary outcome measures will be patient reports during telephone interviews of dentists' behavior at target visits related to the assessment and treatment of tobacco use. Patient reports clustered within providers will be compared among groups with generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with intensity, reimbursement, and intensity x reimbursement factors. Primary analyses will be based on intention-to-treat principles among the four intervention arms. Secondary analyses will include comparisons to the usual care group.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Project 3: Smokeless Tobacco Use among Rural High School Males and p231-301
Fluoride Varnish Reach in Early Childhood
Fluoride Varnish Reach in Early Childhood
Reimbursement and Intensity of Dentists' Training