Bejewelled Identities: 'Aesth/Ethic' Jewels in the Portrayal of Identity in Sixteenth Century Venice
Bejewelled Identities: 'Aesth/Ethic' Jewels in the Portrayal of Identity in Sixteenth Century Venice
批准号:
2881897
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2023
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2023 至 --
中文摘要
在文艺复兴时期的意大利,珠宝的购买和佩戴被反复认为是颓废的产物,人们假设珠宝在肖像画中的作用是吸引和放纵观众的眼睛(Simon,1988)。珠宝与物质上的贪食和淫荡的联系因随之而来的禁止奢侈的法律的“正当性”而加剧,这些法律试图限制珠宝中的装饰,声称它们鼓励道德松懈,但收效甚微。这些“理由”现在被理解为比掩盖恢复可见的社会等级的总体目标的借口好不了多少(牛顿,1988;豪厄尔,2010)。然而,珠宝并没有得到批判性的重新审视,并继续被视为惰性轻浮的象征,从而导致学者完全忽视了这些人工制品的材料机构。我试图开创一个创新的跨学科研究,首先调查珠宝的语义特异性和材料机构,其次重新考虑珠宝作为肖像画中身份表征的积极组成部分,以十六世纪的威尼斯为中心。威尼斯是欧洲的出版和奢侈品生产之都(Lanaro,2006),因此是研究文学、物质和艺术文化交汇点的最佳地点。有三个主要的基础研究问题:-特定的珠宝拥有什么样的媒介,珠宝是如何发挥其媒介作用的?-珠宝的镶嵌、佩戴和展示如何识别和利用它们的感知代理?艺术家如何运用和实验珠宝的物质媒介来描绘和修改肖像画中的身份感知?
英文摘要
The acquisition and wearing of jewels in Renaissance Italy have been repeatedly considered the product of decadence, bringing about the assumption that the function of jewellery in portraiture was to elicit and indulge the viewer's eye (Simon, 1988). The association of jewellery with material gluttony and lasciviousness has been exacerbated by accompanying 'justifications' for sumptuary laws that sought, with little success, to restrict adornment in jewels claiming they encouraged moral laxity. These 'justifications' are now understood to be little better than excuses to mask an overarching aim to reinstate a visible social hierarchy (Newton, 1988; Howell, 2010). However, jewels have not received critical reconsideration and continue to be perceived as inert frivolous ornamentation, thus causing scholars to completely overlook the material agency of these artefacts.I seek to pioneer an innovative interdisciplinary study that firstly investigates the semantic specificity and material agency of jewels and secondly reconsiders jewels as active components in the representation of identity within portraiture, with focus on sixteenth century Venice. Venice was a European capital for publishing and the production of luxury goods (Lanaro, 2006), making it the optimal locality to investigate this intersection between literary, material and artistic cultures.There are three principal underpinning research questions:-What agencies did specific jewels possess and how were jewels believed to exert their agency?-How did the setting, wearing and display of jewels recognise and harness their perceived agency?-How did artists employ and experiment with the material agency of jewels to portray and modifyperceived identity in portraiture?
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金