课题基金 / 基金详情

Osteoporosis Treatment and Drug Holiday Duration

Osteoporosis Treatment and Drug Holiday Duration
骨质疏松症治疗和药物假期持续时间
批准号:
9569267
负责人:
Smita Nayak
金额:
$15.96万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017-09-21 至 2020-08-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Smita Nayak的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
项目总结/摘要 骨质疏松症在美国的老年人中非常普遍,大约有1000万人 影响。近50%的50岁以上的女性和25%的60岁以上的白色男性将遭受 在他们的一生中,有重大后果,包括死亡,执行困难, 日常生活活动、行走能力丧失、疗养院安置和慢性疼痛。 双磷酸盐类药物是破骨细胞骨重塑的强抑制剂, 用于降低骨折风险和治疗骨质疏松症的最常用处方药。FDA- 批准用于治疗骨质疏松症的双膦酸盐包括阿仑膦酸盐、利塞膦酸盐、伊班膦酸盐和 唑来膦酸这些药物不应无限期地持续使用,因为罕见的严重 治疗持续时间超过5年的不良事件,如非典型股骨骨折或颌骨骨坏死 年然而,对于双膦酸盐治疗的最佳持续时间存在不确定性, 患有骨质疏松症的人。此外,对于停止治疗的个体,“药物”的最佳持续时间 假期”或重新开始治疗前停止治疗的时间段未知。 二膦酸盐与骨结合,并可保持结合多年,从而导致残留 停药后数年的药理活性。然而,与骨的结合亲和力在不同的细胞中是不同的。 因此,最佳药物假期持续时间可能取决于药物组合而变化。 特别是二膦酸盐。这项研究的目的是系统地审查证据, 已证明FDA- 批准用于骨质疏松症治疗和相关骨折风险降低疗效的双膦酸盐, 双膦酸盐治疗后骨密度(BMD)的变化,药物假期对骨折的影响 风险和BMD,以及与不同治疗持续时间相关的安全性(不良事件发生率)(目标1); 并比较不同治疗和药物假期持续时间的有效性和成本效益, 每种双膦酸盐用于美国成年骨质疏松症患者(目标2)。我们的分析将解决关键的骨质疏松症 临床护理知识差距,并提供证据来指导治疗持续时间和药物假期持续时间 临床实践中的决策;并帮助实现未来的R 01提案,以研究将 关于临床环境中减少糖尿病相关发病率的最佳治疗实践的研究结果, mortality.我们的研究团队非常适合执行这项工作;我们有丰富的经验, 骨质疏松症的专业知识,系统综述/荟萃分析,成本效益建模,以及跟踪 成功合作的记录。
英文摘要
Project Summary/Abstract Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among older adults in the United States, with approximately 10 million people affected. Nearly 50% of women over age 50 years and 25% of white men over age 60 years will suffer an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetimes, with significant consequences including death, difficulty in performing activities of daily living, loss of ambulatory ability, nursing home placement, and chronic pain. Bisphosphonates, a class of medications that are strong inhibitors of osteoclast bone remodeling, are effective for reducing fracture risk and the most commonly prescribed medications for osteoporosis treatment. FDA- approved bisphosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis include alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid. These medications should not be continued indefinitely due to an increased risk of rare serious adverse events, such as atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw, with therapy duration beyond 5 years. However, there is uncertainty with respect to the optimal duration of bisphosphonate therapy for individuals with osteoporosis. Furthermore, for individuals who stop treatment, the optimal duration of the “drug holiday”, or period of time in which treatment is stopped before restarting treatment, is unknown. Bisphosphonates bind to bone and can remain bound for many years, thus resulting in residual pharmacological activity for years after discontinuation. However, binding affinity to bone varies among the bisphosphonates, and thus it is likely that the optimal drug holiday duration may vary depending on the particular bisphosphonate. The purpose of this proposed research is to systematically review the evidence on the duration of treatment for which fracture risk reduction has been demonstrated for each of the FDA- approved bisphosphonates for osteoporosis treatment and associated fracture risk reduction efficacy and change in bone mineral density (BMD) on bisphosphonate treatment, the impact of drugs holidays on fracture risk and BMD, and the safety (adverse events rates) associated with different durations of treatment (Aim 1); and to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different treatment and drug holiday durations for each bisphosphonate for U.S. adults with osteoporosis (Aim 2). Our analyses would address key osteoporosis clinical care knowledge gaps and provide evidence to guide treatment duration and drug holiday duration decisions in clinical practice; and help enable a future R01 proposal to investigate approaches to translate findings about best treatment practices to the clinical setting to reduce osteoporosis-related morbidity and mortality. Our research team is ideally suited to perform this work; we have substantial experience and expertise in osteoporosis, systematic reviews/meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness modeling, and a track record of successful collaboration.
期刊论文(1)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Cost-effectiveness of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment before bisphosphonate holiday for women with osteoporosis.
对于患有骨质疏松症的女性,在双膦酸盐假期前进行 3 年与 6 年唑来膦酸治疗的成本效益。
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06010-5
发表时间: 2022
期刊: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
影响因子: --
作者: [Nayak,S, Greenspan,SL]
通讯作者: Greenspan,SL
Long-Term Approaches to Treating Osteoporosis
  • 批准号:
    10804038
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $22.3万
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 负责人:
    Smita Nayak
  • 依托单位:
Quantitative Modeling Software with Applications to Medical Decision Making
  • 批准号:
    10823037
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $42.0万
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 负责人:
    Smita Nayak
  • 依托单位:
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strate
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strate
海外基金