Small Financial Incentives to Promote Smoking Cessation in Safety Net Hospital Patients

 描述(由申请人提供)：烟草使用是美国可预防的死亡的首要原因。尽管美国成年人的吸烟率已降至18.1%，但27.9%的贫困人口报告目前正在吸烟。社会经济上的劣势与戒烟的可能性降低有关。越来越多的证据表明，提供戒烟激励措施(即应急管理[CM])可能是促进短期戒烟的有效方法，尽管很少有研究证明长期效果。此外，在CM干预研究中，几乎没有特别关注社会经济上处于不利地位的吸烟者(例如，安全网医院人口)。我们的初步工作表明，当激励措施作为标准的基于临床的戒烟治疗的辅助措施包括在内时，为戒烟提供小规模、不断升级的经济激励措施会极大地提高社会经济弱势吸烟者的短期戒烟率。然而，还需要额外的工作来评估这种CM方法在较长期内的影响，并进行严格和充足的试验。因此，这项拟议研究的目的是：1)评估辅助的、低成本的CM干预(相对于常规护理)对参加安全网医院戒烟计划的社会经济弱势个人的戒烟率的长期影响，以及2)使用传统和生态瞬时评估方法确定干预参与者的治疗机制和与戒烟结果相关的背景因素。在城市安全网医院寻求戒烟治疗的参与者(N=320)将被随机分配到1)常规护理(UC；n=160)或2)UC加生化确认戒烟的经济奖励(CM；n=160)。那些被随机接受CM干预的人将有机会在戒烟后12周内获得经过生化验证的戒烟小礼品卡。具体地说，参与者在戒烟之日可以获得20美元的戒酒收入，在戒烟后4周内，每次连续戒烟，这一金额将增加5美元(总计150美元)。参与者还可以在戒烟后8周和12周额外获得50美元的戒酒礼品卡。经过生物化学验证的戒烟后26周的7天点戒烟盛行率(长期戒烟)将是主要的结果变量，尽管在所有就诊时都会评估吸烟状况。我们也希望通过传统的问卷调查和基于智能手机的生态即时评估方法，更好地了解CM的治疗机制，并找出其他直接影响戒烟的因素。智能手机技术允许“实时”数据收集，以更准确地捕获与戒烟相关的重要变量，并将被用于传递增益框架信息，以支持和加强CM干预。研究结果将为干预研究提供新的治疗目标，并将展示一种有效、廉价和易于实施的方法，通过这种方法来提高经济上处于不利地位的吸烟者的长期戒烟率。

 DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S. Although the prevalence of smoking has declined to 18.1 percent among U.S. adults, 27.9 percent of those living in poverty report current smoking. Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with a reduced likelihood of smoking cessation. There is mounting evidence that offering incentives for abstinence (i.e., Contingency Management [CM]) may be an effective approach for promoting short-term smoking cessation, though few studies have demonstrated longer-term effectiveness. In addition, little attention has been paid to socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers specifically (e.g., safety- net hospital populations) in CM intervention studies. Our preliminary work indicates that offering small escalating financial incentives for smoking abstinence dramatically increases short-term cessation rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers when incentives are included as an adjunct to standard clinic- based smoking cessation treatment. However, additional work is needed to evaluate the influence of this CM approach in the longer-term with a rigorous and adequately powered trial. Thus, the aims of the proposed study are to: 1) evaluate the longer-term impact of an adjunctive, low-cost CM intervention (relative to usual care) on smoking abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in a safety-net hospital smoking cessation program, and 2) identify treatment mechanisms and contextual factors associated with cessation outcomes among intervention participants using both traditional and ecological momentary assessment approaches. Participants seeking smoking cessation treatment at an urban safety net hospital (N = 320) will be randomly assigned to 1) usual care (UC; n = 160) or 2) UC plus financial incentives for biochemically-confirmed abstinence (CM; n = 160). Those randomized to the CM intervention will have the opportunity to earn small gift cards for biochemically-verified abstinence through 12 weeks post-quit. Specifically, participants may earn $20 for abstinence on the quit date, and this amount will increase by $5 with each successive abstinent visit through 4 weeks post-quit ($150 total). Participants may additionally earn $50 gift cards for abstinence at 8 and 12 weeks post-quit. Biochemically-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 26 weeks post-quit (longer-term abstinence) will be the primary outcome variable, though smoking status will be assessed at all visits. We also hope to gain a better understanding of CM treatment mechanisms and to identify other factors that directly influence cessation via traditional questionnaire and smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment approaches. Smartphone technology allows for "real-time" data collection to more accurately capture important cessation-related variables, and will be used to deliver gain-framed messages to support and strengthen the CM intervention. Findings will provide insight about new treatment targets for intervention research, and will demonstrate an effective, inexpensive, and easily implementable means by which to improve longer-term smoking cessation rates among economically disadvantaged smokers.