Unrevealing model compounds of soil conditioners impacts on the wheat straw autohydrolysis efficiency and enzymatic hydrolysis
Unrevealing model compounds of soil conditioners impacts on the wheat straw autohydrolysis efficiency and enzymatic hydrolysis
复制标题
未揭示的土壤改良剂模型化合物对麦秆自水解效率和酶水解的影响
DOI:
10.1186/s13068-020-01763-3
复制
发表时间:
2020-05
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
Qiang Yong
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xinxing Wu;Wei Tang;Chen Huang;Caoxing Huang;Chenhuan Lai;Qiang Yong
BackgroundSoil-derived exogenous ash (EA) poses a challenge toward lignocellulosic autohydrolysis due to its buffering capacity. Previous works focusing on this phenomenon have failed to also investigate the role that soluble salts, and organic matter plays in this system. Herein, sodium phosphate and sodium humate were employed as model buffering compounds representing soluble salts and organic matter and dosed into a de-ashed wheat straw (DWS) autohydrolysis process to show the potential impacts of WS attached soil conditioners on the WS autohydrolysis efficiency which would further affect the enzymatic digestibility of autohydrolyzed WS.ResultsResults showed that with the increasing loadings of sodium phosphate and sodium humate resulted in elevated pH values (from 4.0 to 5.1 and from 4.1 to 4.7, respectively). Meanwhile, the reductions of xylan removal yields from ~ 84.3–61.4% to 72.3–53.0% by loading (1–30 g/L) sodium phosphate and sodium humate during WS autohydrolysis lead to a significant decrease of cellulose accessibilities which finally lead to a reduction of the enzymatic digestibility of autohydrolyzed WS from ~ 75.4–77.2% to 47.3–57.7%.ConclusionThe existence of different types soil conditioner model compounds results in various component fractions from autohydrolyzed WS in the process of autohydrolysis. A lack of sufficient xylan removal was found to drive the significant decrease in enzymatic accessibility. The results demonstrated the various effects of two typical tested soil conditioners on WS autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
F. Khalili;H. Amiri
通讯作者:
F. Khalili;H. Amiri
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Vicki S. Thompson;J. Lacey;Damon S. Hartley;M. Jindra;John E. Aston;D. Thompson
通讯作者:
Vicki S. Thompson;J. Lacey;Damon S. Hartley;M. Jindra;John E. Aston;D. Thompson
影响因子:
8.7
作者:
Saini, Jitendra Kumar;Patel, Anil Kumar;Singhania, Reeta Rani
通讯作者:
Singhania, Reeta Rani
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Li, Xiaoyun;Xu, Rui;Si, Chuanling
通讯作者:
Si, Chuanling