A breath of fresh air - the potential for COVID-19 breath diagnostics.
A breath of fresh air - the potential for COVID-19 breath diagnostics.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103183
复制
发表时间:
2021-01
期刊:
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Kenyon NJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davis CE;Schivo M;Kenyon NJ
As the world continues to grapple with the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it remains clear that frequent and widespread virus testing is a valuable tool to understand disease spread and to guide public health actions by communities and governments. To date, most traditional diagnostic tests continue to rely on established polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies, which have proven to be quite robust as a tool for mass screening and remain the gold standard within modern medicine. When employed using standardized protocols, PCR typically has a high accuracy and high specificity (eg, low false positives and low false negatives). Early in the pandemic, there were challenges to quickly establish and distribute the best testing methods. Once resolved, the test was widely and successfully rolled out in protocols across the world. However, other challenges have emerged when using this as a tool to combat COVID-19 spread. For one, there are known sampling issues with nasopharyngeal PCR tests. While PCR itself is incredibly robust, it relies on collecting samples of actively amplifying viral genetic material. Though uncommon, it is possible to “miss” swabbing an area with active viral loads, which leads to a false-negative test result. There have been many more issues with the operational logistics and product supply chains that have strained testing systems during this public health crisis. The liquid reagents needed for the PCR test and the nasal swabs are in high demand, thus limiting availability in some locations causing alterations to planned testing protocols. Finally, although PCR is very reliable, there can be a significant time delay between sampling and when the results are available À hours-to-days, depending on processing capabilities of the test site.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
15.1
作者:
Ruszkiewicz DM;Sanders D;O'Brien R;Hempel F;Reed MJ;Riepe AC;Bailie K;Brodrick E;Darnley K;Ellerkmann R;Mueller O;Skarysz A;Truss M;Wortelmann T;Yordanov S;Thomas CLP;Schaaf B;Eddleston M
通讯作者:
Eddleston M
影响因子:
17.1
作者:
Shan, Benjie;Broza, Yoav Y.;Haick, Hossam
通讯作者:
Haick, Hossam
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Schivo, Michael;Aksenov, Alexander A.;Davis, Cristina E.
通讯作者:
Davis, Cristina E.
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Traxler, Selina;Bischoff, Ann-Christin;Schubert, Jochen K.
通讯作者:
Schubert, Jochen K.
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Phillips, Michael;Cataneo, Renee N.;Wai, James
通讯作者:
Wai, James