Deficits in category learning in older adults: Rule-based versus clustering accounts.
Deficits in category learning in older adults: Rule-based versus clustering accounts.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/pag0000183
复制
发表时间:
2017-08
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Maylor EA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Badham SP;Sanborn AN;Maylor EA
Memory research has long been one of the key areas of investigation for cognitive aging researchers but only in the last decade or so has categorization been used to understand age differences in cognition. Categorization tasks focus more heavily on the grouping and organization of items in memory, and often on the process of learning relationships through trial and error. Categorization studies allow researchers to more accurately characterize age differences in cognition: whether older adults show declines in the way in which they represent categories with simple rules or declines in representing categories by similarity to past examples. In the current study, young and older adults participated in a set of classic category learning problems, which allowed us to distinguish between three hypotheses: (a) rule-complexity: categories were represented exclusively with rules and older adults had differential difficulty when more complex rules were required, (b) rule-specific: categories could be represented either by rules or by similarity, and there were age deficits in using rules, and (c) clustering: similarity was mainly used and older adults constructed a less-detailed representation by lumping more items into fewer clusters. The ordinal levels of performance across different conditions argued against rule-complexity, as older adults showed greater deficits on less complex categories. The data also provided evidence against rule-specificity, as single-dimensional rules could not explain age declines. Instead, computational modeling of the data indicated that older adults utilized fewer conceptual clusters of items in memory than did young adults.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Gershman, Samuel J.;Blei, David M.;Niv, Yael
通讯作者:
Niv, Yael
DOI:
10.1037/a0022639
发表时间:
2011-05-01
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Lewandowsky, Stephan
通讯作者:
Lewandowsky, Stephan
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Filoteo, JV;Maddox, WT
通讯作者:
Maddox, WT
DOI:
10.1093/geronj/41.2.214
发表时间:
1986-03-01
期刊:
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY
影响因子:
--
作者:
HESS, TM;SLAUGHTER, SJ
通讯作者:
SLAUGHTER, SJ
影响因子:
4
作者:
HESS, TM
通讯作者:
HESS, TM