Impact of Exercise Rehabilitation on Exercise Capacity and Quality-of-Life in Heart Failure: Individual Participant Meta-Analysis.
Impact of Exercise Rehabilitation on Exercise Capacity and Quality-of-Life in Heart Failure: Individual Participant Meta-Analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.072
复制
发表时间:
2019-04-02
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
ExTraMATCH II Collaboration
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Taylor RS;Walker S;Smart NA;Piepoli MF;Warren FC;Ciani O;Whellan D;O'Connor C;Keteyian SJ;Coats A;Davos CH;Dalal HM;Dracup K;Evangelista LS;Jolly K;Myers J;Nilsson BB;Passino C;Witham MD;Yeh GY;ExTraMATCH II Collaboration
Previous systematic reviews have indicated that exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for patients with heart failure (HF) has a beneficial effect on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and exercise capacity. However, there is uncertainty regarding potential differential effects of ExCR across HF patient subgroups. The authors sought to undertake an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to: 1) assess the impact of ExCR on HRQoL and exercise capacity in patients with HF; and 2) investigate differential effects of ExCR according to a range of patient characteristics: age, sex, ethnicity, New York Heart Association functional class, ischemic etiology, ejection fraction, and exercise capacity. A single dataset was produced, comprising randomized trials where ExCR (delivered for 3 weeks or more) was compared with a no exercise control group. Each trial provided IPD on HRQoL or exercise capacity (or both), with follow-up of 6 months or more. One- and 2-stage meta-analysis models were used to investigate the effect of ExCR overall and the interactions between ExCR and participant characteristics. IPD was obtained from 13 trials for 3,990 patients, predominantly (97%) with reduced ejection fraction HF. Compared with the control group, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of ExCR for HRQoL and exercise capacity. At 12-month follow-up, improvements were seen in 6-min walk test (mean 21.0 m; 95% confidence interval: 1.57 to 40.4 m; p = 0.034) and Minnesota Living With HF score (mean improvement 5.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 10.9; p = 0.018). No consistent evidence was found of differential intervention effects across patient subgroups. These results, based on an IPD meta-analysis of randomized trials, confirm the benefit of ExCR on HRQoL and exercise capacity and support the Class I recommendation of current international clinical guidelines that ExCR should be offered to all HF patients. (Exercise Training for Chronic Heart Failure [ExTraMATCH II]: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis; PROSPERO: international database of systematic reviews CRD42014007170).
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
37.8
作者:
Belardinelli, R;Georgiou, D;Purcaro, A
通讯作者:
Purcaro, A
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Mosterd, Arend;Hoes, Arno W.
通讯作者:
Hoes, Arno W.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Mentz, Robert J.;Bittner, Vera;O'Connor, Christopher M.
通讯作者:
O'Connor, Christopher M.
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Hambrecht, R;Gielen, S;Schuler, G
通讯作者:
Schuler, G
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Bilbao, Amaia;Escobar, Antonio;Quiros, Raul
通讯作者:
Quiros, Raul