Testing theories of post-error slowing.
Testing theories of post-error slowing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2
复制
发表时间：
2012-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wagenmakers EJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dutilh G;Vandekerckhove J;Forstmann BU;Keuleers E;Brysbaert M;Wagenmakers EJ
人们在犯错后往往会放慢脚步。这种现象，通常被称为错误后放缓，已被假设为反映知觉分心，时间浪费在不相关的过程中，先验偏见对错误的反应，先验偏见的可变性增加，或增加反应谨慎。虽然反应谨慎的解释占主导地位的实证文献，很少有研究试图在一个正式的过程模型的背景下测试这种解释。在这里，我们使用漂移扩散模型来隔离和识别负责后错误减缓的心理过程。在一个非常大的词汇决策数据集，我们发现，错误后放缓与反应谨慎的增加，并在较小的程度上，反应偏差的变化。在目前的数据集中，我们没有发现证据表明，错误后放缓是由知觉分心或时间浪费在不相关的过程。这些结果支持一个响应监测帐户的错误后放缓。
People tend to slow down after they make an error. This phenomenon, generally referred to as post-error slowing, has been hypothesized to reflect perceptual distraction, time wasted on irrelevant processes, an a priori bias against the response made in error, increased variability in a priori bias, or an increase in response caution. Although the response caution interpretation has dominated the empirical literature, little research has attempted to test this interpretation in the context of a formal process model. Here, we used the drift diffusion model to isolate and identify the psychological processes responsible for post-error slowing. In a very large lexical decision data set, we found that post-error slowing was associated with an increase in response caution and—to a lesser extent—a change in response bias. In the present data set, we found no evidence that post-error slowing is caused by perceptual distraction or time wasted on irrelevant processes. These results support a response-monitoring account of post-error slowing.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Geddes, Jacqueline;Ratcliff, Roger;Deary, Ian J.
通讯作者：
Deary, Ian J.
影响因子：
--
作者：
FITTS, PM
通讯作者：
FITTS, PM
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Keuleers, Emmanuel;Brysbaert, Marc;New, Boris
通讯作者：
New, Boris
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.0805903105
发表时间：
2008-11-11
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Forstmann, Birte U.;Dutilh, Gilles;Wagenmaker, Eric-Jan
通讯作者：
Wagenmaker, Eric-Jan
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
LAMING, D
通讯作者：
LAMING, D