Reading charts in ophthalmology.
Reading charts in ophthalmology.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00417-017-3659-0
复制
发表时间：
2017-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Radner W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Radner W
新一代的对数阅读图表引发了人们对标准化阅读性能分析的兴趣。这种阅读图表是根据国际眼科学理事会的标准开发的。这些校准图表中的打印尺寸级数符合EN ISO 8596的数学背景。这些阅读图表是：Bailey-Lovie单词阅读图表、Colenbrander英语连续文本近视觉卡、Oculus阅读探针II、MNREAD图表、SKread图表和RADNER阅读图表。用于这些阅读图表的测试项目在图表之间不同，并且在不同程度上被标准化。Bailey-Lovie图表、MNREAD图表、SKread图表和RADNER图表还用于测量阅读速度，并允许确定进一步的阅读参数，例如阅读敏锐度、基于阅读敏锐度的阅读速度、临界打印尺寸、阅读分数和logMAR/logRAD比率。这种校准的阅读图表已经在许多研究中为患者的阅读表现提供了有价值的见解。它们以多种语言提供，从而促进了关于近视觉性能的国际交流。本文介绍了这些现代阅读图的背景，并讨论了它们的不同试题标准化水平。临床研究中提到，并讨论了不适当的高数量的阅读敏锐度符号是包括在内。出于研究目的使用对数阅读敏锐度测定（[logRAD] = logMAR的阅读敏锐度当量）测量将使阅读敏锐度具有其自身的特性，作为眼科学中的标准化阅读参数。
A new generation of logarithmic reading charts has sparked interest in standardized reading performance analyses. Such reading charts have been developed according to the standards of the International Council of Ophthalmology. The print size progression in these calibrated charts is in accordance with the mathematical background of EN ISO 8596. These reading charts are: the Bailey–Lovie Word Reading Chart, the Colenbrander English Continuous Text Near Vision Cards, the Oculus Reading Probe II, the MNREAD Charts, the SKread Charts, and the RADNER Reading Charts. The test items used for these reading charts differ among the charts and are standardized to various extents. The Bailey–Lovie Charts, MNREAD Charts, SKread Charts, and RADNER Charts are also meant to measure reading speed and allow determination of further reading parameters such as reading acuity, reading speed based on reading acuity, critical print size, reading score, and logMAR/logRAD ratio. Such calibrated reading charts have already provided valuable insights into the reading performance of patients in many research studies. They are available in many languages and thus facilitate international communication about near visual performance. In the present review article, the backgrounds of these modern reading charts are presented, and their different levels of test-item standardization are discussed. Clinical research studies are mentioned, and a discussion about the immoderately high number of reading acuity notations is included. Using the logReading Acuity Determination ([logRAD] = reading acuity equivalent of logMAR) measure for research purposes would give reading acuity its own identity as a standardized reading parameter in ophthalmology.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
BOUMA, H
通讯作者：
BOUMA, H
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
AHN, SJ;LEGGE, GE
通讯作者：
LEGGE, GE
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Brown, David;Dougherty, Paul;Sanders, Monica L.
通讯作者：
Sanders, Monica L.
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Caramoy, Albert;Fauser, Sascha;Kirchhof, Bernd
通讯作者：
Kirchhof, Bernd
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Alio, Jorge L.;Plaza-Puche, Ana B.;Ortega, Paula
通讯作者：
Ortega, Paula