Is flood resilience planning improving? A longitudinal analysis of networks of plans in Boston and Fort Lauderdale
Is flood resilience planning improving? A longitudinal analysis of networks of plans in Boston and Fort Lauderdale
复制标题
防洪规划是否有所改善？
DOI：
10.1016/j.crm.2021.100354
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Berke, Phil
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Woodruff, Sierra;Meerow, Sara;Gilbertson, Philip;Hannibal, Bryce;Matos, Melina;Roy, Malini;Malecha, Matthew;Yu, Siyu;Berke, Phil
随着气候变化增加洪水风险，人们越来越认识到，城市采用的多项计划往往会产生相互交叉的目的，并鼓励当前和未来面临洪水风险的地区进行开发。有人呼吁采取更加协调的方法来规划当前和未来的洪水风险，但规划是否能够应对挑战？我们应用弹性计分卡规划整合 (PIRS) 方法来空间评估影响不同城市规划网络中洪水物理脆弱性的政策，这些城市规划影响马萨诸塞州波士顿和佛罗里达州劳德代尔堡的土地利用和引导发展。与此方法的先前应用不同，我们着眼于计划网络如何随时间变化。 2015 年至 2019 年间，这两个城市对气候变化的关注不断增加，整个网络中可能降低物理脆弱性的计划和政策的数量也在增加。气候变化适应计划等新型计划在减少洪水风险方面发挥着重要作用。然而，这些计划延续了过去政策关注的差异。作为第一项分析城市规划网络及其对复原力的潜在影响如何随时间演变的研究，这项工作对于规划学术和实践以及更广泛的灾害和气候变化治理具有重要意义。
As climate change increases flood risk, there is growing recognition that the multiple plans cities adopt often work at cross purposes and encourage development in areas at risk of current and future flooding. There have been calls for a more coordinated approach to planning for current and future flood risks, but is planning rising to the challenge? We apply the Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard (PIRS) methodology to spatially evaluate policies that would impact physical vulnerability to flooding in the network of different city plans that shape land use and steer development in Boston, MA and Fort Lauderdale, FL. Unlike previous applications of this approach, we look at how the plan network is changing over time. Between 2015 and 2019, attention on climate change grew in both cities, as did the number of plans and policies across the network with the potential to decrease physical vulnerability. New types of plans, such as climate change adaptation plans, play an important role in reducing flood risks. However, plans perpetuate past disparities in policy attention. As the first study to analyze how city networks of plans and their potential impact on resilience evolve over time, this work has important implications for planning scholarship and practice as well as hazard and climate change governance more broadly.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Berke, Philip;Yu, Siyu;Cooper, John
通讯作者：
Cooper, John
计划什么时候重要？
影响因子：
5.6
作者：
Lu Liao;M. Warner;G. Homsy
通讯作者：
G. Homsy
计划网络以及灾害和气候变化脆弱性评估：复原力记分卡
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
P. Berke;Galen D. Newman;Jaekyung Lee;Tabitha S. Combs;Carl Kolosna;D. Salvesen
通讯作者：
D. Salvesen
规划信息系统方法：利用和制定景观保护规划
影响因子：
9.1
作者：
D. Finn;L. Hopkins;M. Wempe
通讯作者：
M. Wempe
气候变化适应政策和实践：代理人、机构和系统的作用
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Birchall;Nicole L. Bonnett
通讯作者：
Nicole L. Bonnett