Civil war recurrence and postwar violence: Toward an integrated research agenda.
Civil war recurrence and postwar violence: Toward an integrated research agenda.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/13540661211006443
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
van Baalen S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bara C;Deglow A;van Baalen S
内战后的暴力是对可持续和平的挑战。今天的许多武装冲突是以前战争的重演，许多关于战后暴力的文献解释了武装团体重返战场的原因。但即使和平占上风，许多其他类型的暴力也会在战后环境中发生。这种战后的暴力同样也是越来越多的多学科文学的主题。利用引文网络分析，我们表明，关于战争复发和战后暴力的研究是在相对孤立的情况下发展起来的--尽管这些现象是相互关联的。这种划分使我们忽视了导致战后不同形式暴力的驱动因素的重要相同和不同之处。我们通过回顾这两个密切相关领域的文献来证明这一点。虽然战争复发和战后暴力有一系列共同的风险因素，但有些因素可能会对这两种结果产生相反的影响。由于这些见解只有在系统地比较这两种文学时才会出现，所以我们提出了一个新的研究战后暴力的框架，旨在克服这两个领域研究的区分性。该框架既是概念上的镜头，也是对战后不同形式的暴力进行分类和比较的分析工具。然后，我们概述了该框架如何帮助学者追求综合研究议程，并就应该研究的研究问题提出具体建议，以扩大我们对战后暴力的理解。
Violence after civil war is a challenge to sustainable peace. Many armed conflicts today are recurrences of previous wars and much of the literature on violence after war explains why armed groups return to the battlefield. But even if peace prevails, many other types of violence take place in postwar environments. This postwar violence is likewise subject to a growing multidisciplinary literature. Using citation network analysis, we show that research on war recurrence and postwar violence has developed in relative isolation from each other—although these phenomena are interrelated. This compartmentalization leads us to overlook important similarities and differences in the drivers of different forms of violence after war. We demonstrate this by reviewing the literature in both of these closely related fields. While war recurrence and postwar violence share a set of common risk factors, some factors can have opposite effects on the two outcomes. Because these insights only emerge when systematically comparing the two strands of literature, we propose a novel framework for the study of violence after wars that aims at overcoming the compartmentalization of research within these two fields. The framework serves both as a conceptual lens and an analytical tool to categorize and compare different forms of violence after war. We then outline how the framework aids scholars in pursuing an integrated research agenda, with concrete suggestions for research questions that should be studied to expand our understanding of violence after wars.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Autesserre, Severine
通讯作者：
Autesserre, Severine
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Collier, Paul;Hoeffler, Anke;Soderbom, Mans
通讯作者：
Soderbom, Mans
影响因子：
6.8
作者：
Blair, Robert A.;Karim, Sabrina M.;Morse, Benjamin S.
通讯作者：
Morse, Benjamin S.
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Call, Charles T.
通讯作者：
Call, Charles T.
DOI：
10.1146/annurev-polisci-051915-045433
发表时间：
2017-01-01
期刊：
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 20
影响因子：
--
作者：
Carey, Sabine C.;Mitchell, Neil J.
通讯作者：
Mitchell, Neil J.