Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.

Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.
复制标题

手语量词加工的心理语言学机制。

DOI:
10.1037/xlm0000958
复制
发表时间:
2021-06
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Roehm D
Roehm D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Krebs J;Malaia E;Wilbur RB;Roehm D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

观看手语的非签名者有时能够通过依靠形式和含义或标志性之间的公开联系来猜测标志的含义(参见)。一个单词类中的标志性语言是高度标志性的,是分类器:类似于动词的标志,可以参考位置更改或处理。分类器的使用和含义受语言规则的约束,但是,与词汇动词标志相比,分类器的形态形式学高度可变(符号内的各种潜在的手柄和运动方向的种类)。这些开放型语言的语言项目促使人们关于其处理机制的问题:它们是手势 - 避孕系统的一部分(像非签名者的手势一样处理),还是作为语言动词进行处理?为了检查分类器理解的心理机制,我们记录了签名人的脑电图,他们观看了与分类器的签名句子的视频。我们操纵了刺激的句子单词顺​​序(主题 - 对象 - verb; sov vs.对象对象 - verb; osv),将两个条件对比,根据不同的处理假设,应增加OSV订单的处理成本。如先前报道的词汇迹象,我们观察到OSV的N400效应,与反映语言处理的认知载荷增加相比。这些发现支持以下假设:分类器是语言语言的语言部分,从而在语言形式和含义的界面上扩展了对处理机制的当前理解。
Non-signers viewing sign language are sometimes able to guess the meaning of signs by relying on the overt connection between form and meaning, or iconicity (cf.). One word class in sign languages that appears to be highly iconic, is classifiers: verb-like signs that can refer to location change, or handling. Classifier use and meaning is governed by linguistic rules, yet, in comparison with lexical verb signs, classifiers are highly variable in their morpho-phonology (variety of potential handshapes and motion direction within the sign). These open-class linguistic items in sign languages prompt the question about the mechanisms of their processing: are they part of gestural-semiotic system (processed like the gestures of non-signers), or are they processed as linguistic verbs? To examine the psychological mechanisms of classifier comprehension, we recorded EEG of signers, who watched videos of signed sentences with classifiers. We manipulated sentence word order of the stimuli (Subject-Object-Verb; SOV vs. Object-Subject-Verb; OSV), contrasting the two conditions which, according to different processing hypotheses, should incur increased processing costs for OSV orders. As previously reported for lexical signs, we observed an N400 effect for OSV compared to SOV reflecting increased cognitive load for linguistic processing. These findings support the hypothesis that classifiers are a linguistic part of speech in sign language, extending current understanding of processing mechanisms at the interface of linguistic form and meaning.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00484
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Emmorey K;McCullough S;Mehta S;Grabowski TJ
通讯作者: Grabowski TJ
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.008
发表时间: 2005-02-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Emmorey, K;Grabowski, T;Damasio, H
通讯作者: Damasio, H
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.010
发表时间: 2013-04-01
期刊: BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina;Schlesewsky, Matthias
通讯作者: Schlesewsky, Matthias
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00339
发表时间: 2013-04
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Emmorey K;McCullough S;Mehta S;Ponto LL;Grabowski TJ
通讯作者: Grabowski TJ
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.542671
发表时间: 2011-01-01
期刊: LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子: --
作者:
Baggio, Giosue;Hagoort, Peter
通讯作者: Hagoort, Peter