When national drug surveys "take too long": An examination of who is at risk for survey fatigue.
When national drug surveys "take too long": An examination of who is at risk for survey fatigue.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108769
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Palamar JJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Le A;Han BH;Palamar JJ
National surveys are a leading method for estimating prevalence of substance use and other health-related behaviors. However, when a participant perceives a survey as too time-consuming, there is a higher probability of lower quality responses. We examined data from the 2018 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized individuals ages ≥12 in the U.S. (N = 112,184). Participants were asked about 13 drug classes on this hour-long survey, and those reporting use of a drug were asked follow-up questions. We estimated prevalence and correlates of participants stating that the survey took too long to complete. An estimated 9.4 % (95 % CI: 8.9–9.8) felt the survey took too long. The more drugs used in the past year, the higher the odds of reporting that the survey took too long. Those reporting use of 8–13 drug classes in particular were at higher odds (aOR = 2.91, 95 % CI: 1.44–5.87). More missing responses was associated with higher odds—particularly when ≥5 drug-related questions were skipped (aOR = 3.26, 95 % CI: 2.26–4.71). Participants who did not speak any English (aOR = 1.74, 95 % CI: 1.31–2.32), have difficulty concentrating (aOR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.23–1.54), and/or had trouble understanding the interview (aOR = 3.99, 95 % CI: 3.51–4.53) were at higher odds, as were those who were older and non-white. Higher education and family income was associated with lower odds. We identified subgroups of individuals most likely to experience fatigue on a national drug survey. Researchers should recognize that long surveys with extensive follow-up questions may lead to respondent fatigue.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Han BH;Le A;Funk-White M;Palamar JJ
通讯作者:
Palamar JJ
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
O'Reilly-Shah, Vikas N.
通讯作者:
O'Reilly-Shah, Vikas N.
影响因子:
8.2
作者:
Kieffer, Michael J.
通讯作者:
Kieffer, Michael J.
影响因子:
6
作者:
Aharonovich, Efrat;Shmulewitz, Dvora;Hasin, Deborah S.
通讯作者:
Hasin, Deborah S.
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Palamar, Joseph J.;Le, Austin;Mateu-Gelabert, Pedro
通讯作者:
Mateu-Gelabert, Pedro