Structural and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Pyrus hopeiensis-"Wild Plants with a Tiny Population"-and Three Other Pyrus Species.
Structural and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Pyrus hopeiensis-"Wild Plants with a Tiny Population"-and Three Other Pyrus Species.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3390/ijms19103262
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-20
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Yang M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li Y;Zhang J;Li L;Gao L;Xu J;Yang M
Pyrus hopeiensis is a valuable wild resource of Pyrus in the Rosaceae. Due to its limited distribution and population decline, it has been listed as one of the “wild plants with a tiny population” in China. To date, few studies have been conducted on P. hopeiensis. This paper offers a systematic review of P. hopeiensis, providing a basis for the conservation and restoration of P. hopeiensis resources. In this study, the chloroplast genomes of two different genotypes of P. hopeiensis, P. ussuriensis Maxin. cv. Jingbaili, P. communis L. cv. Early Red Comice, and P. betulifolia were sequenced, compared and analyzed. The two P. hopeiensis genotypes showed a typical tetrad chloroplast genome, including a pair of inverted repeats encoding the same but opposite direction sequences, a large single copy (LSC) region, and a small single copy (SSC) region. The length of the chloroplast genome of P. hopeiensis HB-1 was 159,935 bp, 46 bp longer than that of the chloroplast genome of P. hopeiensis HB-2. The lengths of the SSC and IR regions of the two Pyrus genotypes were identical, with the only difference present in the LSC region. The GC content was only 0.02% higher in P. hopeiensis HB-1. The structure and size of the chloroplast genome, the gene species, gene number, and GC content of P. hopeiensis were similar to those of the other three Pyrus species. The IR boundary of the two genotypes of P. hopeiensis showed a similar degree of expansion. To determine the evolutionary history of P. hopeiensis within the genus Pyrus and the Rosaceae, 57 common protein-coding genes from 36 Rosaceae species were analyzed. The phylogenetic tree showed a close relationship between the genera Pyrus and Malus, and the relationship between P. hopeiensis HB-1 and P. hopeiensis HB-2 was the closest.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Bausher MG;Singh ND;Lee SB;Jansen RK;Daniell H
通讯作者:
Daniell H
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Nie X;Lv S;Zhang Y;Du X;Wang L;Biradar SS;Tan X;Wan F;Weining S
通讯作者:
Weining S
DOI:
10.4268/cjcmm20162213
发表时间:
2016-11-01
期刊:
Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica
影响因子:
--
作者:
Li, Ying;Kuang, Xue-Jun;Sun, Chao
通讯作者:
Sun, Chao
影响因子:
13.8
作者:
Nock, Catherine J.;Waters, Daniel L. E.;Henry, Robert J.
通讯作者:
Henry, Robert J.
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Lohse M;Drechsel O;Kahlau S;Bock R
通讯作者:
Bock R