Collaborative governance: A potential approach to preventing violent demolition in China

Collaborative governance: A potential approach to preventing violent demolition in China
复制标题

协同治理:预防中国暴力拆迁的潜在途径

DOI:
10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.019
复制
发表时间:
2018-09
期刊:
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Xu Zhihang
Xu Zhihang
中科院分区:
经济学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu Lei;Xu Zhihang

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

由于国家与公民关系的不平衡和对抗性,近年来中国的城市重建过程中伴随着持续不断的暴力冲突,这在很大程度上损害了中国政府的公众形象。本文首先从制度安排的角度概述了中国暴力拆迁背后的治理困境,然后提出了协作方式可以解决这一困境。在介绍和定义协同治理的基础上,本文以成都曹家巷项目为例,论证了协同治理在预防暴力拆迁中的应用。研究发现,协同治理有利于增强治理的合法性,增加找到有效解决方案的潜力,增强政府与公民之间的信任。尽管协同治理存在一些缺点,包括效果有限、对社会资本的依赖、利益相关者互动和领导的质量等,但本文认为,只要满足以下制度要求,曹家巷项目的成功就可以复制:1)城市重建项目中建立和运作拆迁人协会的制度程序; 2)上级政府监督下级政府违法行为的有效投诉制度; 3)独立于地方政府的司法系统,并对任何非法拆迁行为采取法律程序。
Due to the unbalanced and confrontational state-citizen relationship, China's urban redevelopment has been accompanied with continuous violent conflicts, which to a large extent damages the public image of Chinese government in recent years. This article first overviews the governance dilemma underlying China's violent demolition from the perspective of institutional arrangement, and then argues a collaborative approach can be a remedy for the dilemma. After the introduction and definition of collaborative governance, this article demonstrates its application in preventing violent demolition with the Caojiaxiang project in Chengdu as a case. It is found that collaborative governance is advantageous in enhancing the legitimacy of governance, increasing the potential to find effective solutions, and enhancing the trust between government and citizens. Despite the disadvantages of collaborative governance, including limited effect and the dependence on social capital, quality of stakeholders' interaction and leadership, this paper argues the success of Caojiaxiang project may be duplicated given the following institutional requirements are met: 1) an institutional procedure to establish and operate evictees' association in urban redevelopment projects; 2) an effective complaint system for the upper-level government to monitor the malpractice of lower-level government; and 3) an judicial system independent of local governments and legal proceeding over any illegal behavior in demolition.
DOI: 10.1177/0095399705276111
发表时间: 2005-07-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Imperial, M
通讯作者: Imperial, M
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9493.00129
发表时间: 2002-11
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
K. Olds;T. Bunnell;S. Leckie
通讯作者: K. Olds;T. Bunnell;S. Leckie
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.002
发表时间: 2009-10
影响因子: 6
作者:
G. Kallis;M. Kiparsky;R. Norgaard
通讯作者: G. Kallis;M. Kiparsky;R. Norgaard
DOI: 10.5860/choice.48-2852
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
You-tien Hsing
通讯作者: You-tien Hsing
DOI: 10.4324/9780203002162
发表时间: 2001-05
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Lewis
通讯作者: D. Lewis