Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute.
Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020
复制
发表时间:
2021-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kaleebu P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lutalo T;Nalumansi A;Olara D;Kayiwa J;Ogwang B;Odwilo E;Watera C;Balinandi S;Kiconco J;Nakaseegu J;Serwanga J;Kikaire B;Ssemwanga D;Abiko B;Nsereko C;Cotten M;Buule J;Lutwama J;Downing R;Kaleebu P
Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated. A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel. A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement. This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Jacobs J;Kühne V;Lunguya O;Affolabi D;Hardy L;Vandenberg O
通讯作者:
Vandenberg O
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Long, Quan-Xin;Liu, Bai-Zhong;Huang, Ai-Long
通讯作者:
Huang, Ai-Long
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Xu, Gang;Emanuel, Anthony J.;Babic, Nikolina
通讯作者:
Babic, Nikolina
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Batra, Rahul;Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez;Cloherty, Gavin
通讯作者:
Cloherty, Gavin
影响因子:
24.3
作者:
Lou, Bin;Li, Ting-Dong;Chen, Yu
通讯作者:
Chen, Yu