COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.

COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph17176237
复制
发表时间:
2020-08-27
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
On Behalf Of The Eclb-Covid Consortium
On Behalf Of The Eclb-Covid Consortium
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ammar A;Chtourou H;Boukhris O;Trabelsi K;Masmoudi L;Brach M;Bouaziz B;Bentlage E;How D;Ahmed M;Mueller P;Mueller N;Hsouna H;Aloui A;Hammouda O;Paineiras-Domingos LL;Braakman-Jansen A;Wrede C;Bastoni S;Pernambuco CS;Mataruna L;Taheri M;Irandoust K;Khacharem A;Bragazzi NL;Strahler J;Washif JA;Andreeva A;Khoshnami SC;Samara E;Zisi V;Sankar P;Ahmed WN;Romdhani M;Delhey J;Bailey SJ;Bott NT;Gargouri F;Chaari L;Batatia H;Ali GM;Abdelkarim O;Jarraya M;Abed KE;Souissi N;Gemert-Pijnen LV;Riemann BL;Riemann L;Moalla W;Gómez-Raja J;Epstein M;Sanderman R;Schulz S;Jerg A;Al-Horani R;Mansi T;Jmail M;Barbosa F;Ferreira-Santos F;Šimunič B;Pišot R;Pišot S;Gaggioli A;Zmijewski P;Apfelbacher C;Steinacker J;Saad HB;Glenn JM;Chamari K;Driss T;Hoekelmann A;On Behalf Of The Eclb-Covid Consortium

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在新型冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行期间,公共卫生建议和政府措施对日常生活实施了诸多限制,包括社交距离、隔离和居家限制。虽然这些措施对于减缓COVID - 19的传播至关重要,但这些限制对社会心理健康的影响尚不明确。因此,2020年4月发起了一项国际在线调查,以阐明COVID - 19限制措施对行为和生活方式的影响。本报告呈现了一千多名受访者在社会参与和生活满意度方面的初步结果。 方法:来自欧洲、北非、西亚和美洲的35个研究机构通过其网络以7种语言(英语、德语、法语、阿拉伯语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语和斯洛文尼亚语)向普通社会推广这项调查。问题以对比形式呈现,涉及限制条件“之前”和“期间”的相关回答。 结果:来自亚洲(36%)、非洲(40%)、欧洲(21%)和其他地区(3%)的1047名参与者(54%为女性)被纳入分析。研究结果显示,在强制实施的COVID - 19居家限制期间存在社会心理压力。强制限制导致通过家庭(-58%)、朋友/邻居(-44.9%)或娱乐(-46.7%)进行的社交活动量大幅减少(p < 0.001)。这些对社会参与的负面影响还与限制期间生活满意度降低(-30.5%)有关。相反,在限制期间,通过数字技术的社交联系得分显著提高(p < 0.001),更多人(+24.8%)通过数字技术进行社交联系。 结论:这些初步研究结果阐明了2020年COVID - 19早期居家限制期间存在社会心理压力的风险。因此,为了减轻居家限制的负面社会心理影响,强烈建议实施侧重于通过基于技术的解决方案促进社会包容的国家战略。
Public health recommendations and governmental measures during the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have enforced numerous restrictions on daily living including social distancing, isolation, and home confinement. While these measures are imperative to mitigate spreading of COVID-19, the impact of these restrictions on psychosocial health is undefined. Therefore, an international online survey was launched in April 2020 to elucidate the behavioral and lifestyle consequences of COVID-19 restrictions. This report presents the preliminary results from more than one thousand responders on social participation and life satisfaction. Methods: Thirty-five research organizations from Europe, North-Africa, Western Asia, and the Americas promoted the survey through their networks to the general society, in 7 languages (English, German, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and Slovenian). Questions were presented in a differential format with questions related to responses “before” and “during” confinement conditions. Results: 1047 participations (54% women) from Asia (36%), Africa (40%), Europe (21%), and others (3%) were included in the analysis. Findings revealed psychosocial strain during the enforced COVID-19 home confinement. Large decreases (p < 0.001) in the amount of social activity through family (−58%), friends/neighbors (−44.9%), or entertainment (−46.7%) were triggered by the enforced confinement. These negative effects on social participation were also associated with lower life satisfaction (−30.5%) during the confinement period. Conversely, the social contact score through digital technologies significantly increased (p < 0.001) during the confinement period with more individuals (+24.8%) being socially connected through digital technology. Conclusion: These preliminary findings elucidate the risk of psychosocial strain during the early COVID-19 home confinement period in 2020. Therefore, in order to mitigate the negative psychosocial effects of home confinement, implementation of national strategies focused on promoting social inclusion through a technology-based solution is strongly suggested.
DOI: 10.3201/eid1007.030703
发表时间: 2004-07
影响因子: 11.8
作者:
Hawryluck L;Gold WL;Robinson S;Pogorski S;Galea S;Styra R
通讯作者: Styra R
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-3-199908030-00002
发表时间: 1999-08-03
影响因子: 39.2
作者:
Bassuk, SS;Glass, TA;Berkman, LF
通讯作者: Berkman, LF
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163
发表时间: 2011-07-26
期刊: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Huber, Machteld;Knottnerus, J Andre;Smid, Henk
通讯作者: Smid, Henk
DOI: 10.1002/casp.616
发表时间: 2001-03-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Prilleltensky, I;Nelson, G;Peirson, L
通讯作者: Peirson, L
国际体育活动问卷的有效性简短形式(IPAQ-SF):系统评价。
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115
发表时间: 2011-10-21
期刊: The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
影响因子: --
作者:
Lee PH;Macfarlane DJ;Lam TH;Stewart SM
通讯作者: Stewart SM