Learning to fly: lessons for the resuscitation community from the aviation industry.
Learning to fly: lessons for the resuscitation community from the aviation industry.
复制标题
学习飞行:航空业给复苏界的教训。
DOI:
10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000147
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Haukoos,Jason
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sasson,Comilla;Haukoos,Jason
This type of intense data analysis requires large amounts of observational data, the ability to take into account multiple variables, and the desire to create standardized processes to improve the safety of air travel by the entire industry. We challenge the resuscitation science community to take this same approach. It may be that a large-scale effort to systematically collect standardized data on CPR quality will allow us to determine the optimal process to provide safe, effective, and efficient CPR. We must then be willing to use these data in a process of rapid process improvement to ensure that every patient who experiences cardiac arrest will have a systematic, standardized approach to resuscitation. Although organizations like the American Heart Association3 and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation4 systematically review the best available evidence every 5 years, we believe it is time for a new approach to answer the ultimate question of how can we optimize CPR to maximize the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation. The current 5-year cycle of guideline revision is based on analyzing the best available evidence on hundreds of topics; however, this process of guideline creation may actually hinder rapid advancements and improvement in resuscitation. New advances in the field (eg, hands-only CPR, 5 cardiocerebral resuscitation) 6 that fall outside the guideline revision cycle are not incorporated into the guidelines for up to 4 years after the landmark studies.We propose a paradigm shift in the field of resuscitation science based on the lessons learned from the aviation industry. To improve our understanding of how CPR may positively affect resuscitation efforts, we believe it is time for (1) largescale, centralized collection of prospective CPR metric data;(2) linkage of these data to appropriate resuscitation-centered outcomes (ie, return of spontaneous circulation);(3) systematic, rigorous, and rapid analyses; and (4) use of the results to drive resuscitation process improvements at the community and emergency medical services agency levels. These changes admittedly will not come easily, but we believe this is the only way to truly answer the important questions Wallace et al1 outlined in their article. The field of resuscitation science has a lot to learn from the aviation industry; increasing survival by 50%
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
S. Rosenthal;E. Schriock;S. Kaplan;R. Guillemin;M. Grumbach
通讯作者:
M. Grumbach
DOI:
10.1210/jcem-60-2-370
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
影响因子:
--
作者:
Vance,ML;Kaiser,DL;Evans,WS;Thorner,MO;Furlanetto,R;Rivier,J;Vale,W;Perisutti,G;Frohman,LA
通讯作者:
Frohman,LA
DOI:
10.1210/jcem-59-4-580
发表时间:
1984
期刊:
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
影响因子:
--
作者:
Rogol,AD;Blizzard,RM;Johanson,AJ;Furlanetto,RW;Evans,WS;Rivier,J;Vale,WW;Thorner,MO
通讯作者:
Thorner,MO
DOI:
10.1210/jcem-62-1-95
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Wagner;G. Brabant;F. Warsch;R. Hesch;A. von zur Mühlen
通讯作者:
A. von zur Mühlen
DOI:
10.1210/jcem-58-1-215
发表时间:
1984
期刊:
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
影响因子:
--
作者:
Shibasaki,T;Shizume,K;Masuda,A;Nakahara,M;Hizuka,N;Miyakawa,M;Takano,K;Demura,H;Wakabayashi,I;Ling,N
通讯作者:
Ling,N