Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study.

Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/pubmed/fdab005
复制
发表时间:
2021-09-22
期刊:
Journal of public health (Oxford, England)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Yardley L
Yardley L
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Denford S;Morton KS;Lambert H;Zhang J;Smith LE;Rubin GJ;Cai S;Zhang T;Robin C;Lasseter G;Hickman M;Oliver I;Yardley L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

有证据表明,为减少冠状病毒传播而采取的措施对黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔社区以及低收入人群的影响不成比例。需要了解这些人群中坚持治疗的障碍。在这项定性研究中,我们检查了遵守缓解措施的模式和支撑这些行为的原因。对来自白人白人和低收入白人背景的20名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。该主题指南旨在探讨个人在大流行期间如何坚持保持社交距离和自我隔离,并探讨这种行为背后的原因。我们确定了三类对封锁措施的遵守:(i)谨慎驱动的超级遵守;(ii)适应风险的部分遵守;(iii)必要性驱动的部分遵守。关于依从性的决定考虑了接触病毒的可能性、通过使用保护措施降低风险的能力以及认为这种行为的重要性/必要性。这项研究强调,有必要更细致地了解封锁措施的遵守情况。提供实际和财政支持可以减少因需要而不得不进行部分坚持治疗的人数。需要更多的证据来证明采取风险适应部分依从性的人群的风险。
Evidence highlights the disproportionate impact of measures that have been introduced to reduce the spread of coronavirus on individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, and among those on a low income. An understanding of barriers to adherence in these populations is needed. In this qualitative study, we examined the patterns of adherence to mitigation measures and reasons underpinning these behaviors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants from BAME and low-income White backgrounds. The topic guide was designed to explore how individuals are adhering to social distancing and self-isolation during the pandemic and to explore the reasons underpinning this behavior. We identified three categories of adherence to lockdown measures: (i) caution-motivated super-adherence (ii) risk-adapted partial-adherence and (iii) necessity-driven partial-adherence. Decisions about adherence considered potential for exposure to the virus, ability to reduce risk through use of protective measures and perceived importance of/need for the behavior. This research highlights a need for a more nuanced understanding of adherence to lockdown measures. Provision of practical and financial support could reduce the number of people who have to engage in necessity-driven partial-adherence. More evidence is required on population level risks of people adopting risk-adapted partial-adherence.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6279.1847
发表时间: 1981-01-01
影响因子: 105.7
作者:
ROSE, G
通讯作者: ROSE, G
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570567
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Brand R;Timme S;Nosrat S
通讯作者: Nosrat S
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239795
发表时间: 2020
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Coroiu A;Moran C;Campbell T;Geller AC
通讯作者: Geller AC
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924
发表时间: 2020-04-16
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Gao, Junling;Zheng, Pinpin;Dai, Junming
通讯作者: Dai, Junming
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09255-7
发表时间: 2020-07-20
期刊: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Zult, Tjerk;Smith, Lee;Pardhan, Shahina
通讯作者: Pardhan, Shahina