Broadleaf seedling responses to warmer temperatures “chilled” by late frost that favors conifers
Broadleaf seedling responses to warmer temperatures “chilled” by late frost that favors conifers
复制标题
阔叶幼苗对晚霜“寒冷”的温暖温度的反应有利于针叶树
DOI:
10.1007/s10342-014-0786-6
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Ammer C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fisichelli N;Ammer C
Climate change includes not only shifts in mean conditions but also changes in the frequency and timing of extreme weather events. Tree seedlings, as the potential future overstory, are responding to the selective pressures of both mean and extreme conditions. We investigated how increases in mean temperature and the occurrence of late spring frosts affect emergence, development, growth, and survival of 13 native and non-native broadleaf and conifer tree species common in central Europe. Three temperature levels (ambient, +3, and +6 °C) and three spring frost treatments (control, late, and very late) were applied. Development responses of first-year seedlings to warmer temperatures were similar in direction and magnitude for broadleaf and conifer species. Stem size also increased with rising mean temperature for most species, though broadleaf species had maximal height advantage over conifer species in the warmest treatment. Sensitivity to frost differed sharply between the broadleaf and conifer groups. Broadleaf survival and stem length exhibited strong reductions due to frost events while conifer species only showed minor decreases in survival. Importantly, more rapid development and earlier leaf-out in response to warmer temperatures were associated with increased mortality from frost for broadleaf species but decreased mortality for conifer species. This research suggests that compositional shifts in the direction of species favored by increasing mean temperatures may be slowed by extreme events, and thus, the occurrence and impacts of such weather events must be acknowledged and incorporated into research and forest planning.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
G. Grassi;G. Minotta;R. Giannini;U. Bagnaresi
通讯作者:
U. Bagnaresi
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
B. Lazarus;P. Schaberg;G. Hawley;D. DeHayes
通讯作者:
D. DeHayes
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
N. Fisichelli;L. Frelich;P. Reich
通讯作者:
P. Reich
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
M. Overbeck;Matthias Schmidt
通讯作者:
Matthias Schmidt
影响因子:
1.1
作者:
C. Coursolle;F. Bigras;H. Margolis
通讯作者:
H. Margolis