A transformative mission for prioritising nature in Australian cities.

A transformative mission for prioritising nature in Australian cities.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s13280-022-01725-z
复制
发表时间:
2022-06
期刊:
影响因子:
6.5
通讯作者:
Ossola A
Ossola A
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Frantzeskaki N;Oke C;Barnett G;Bekessy S;Bush J;Fitzsimons J;Ignatieva M;Kendal D;Kingsley J;Mumaw L;Ossola A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

澳大利亚正经历着与城市化进程、生物多样性丧失和城市普遍感受到的气候变化有关的越来越大的压力。与此同时,城市可以在应对这些相互关联的紧急情况的开创性方法和解决方案方面发挥主导作用。在这篇透视文章中,我们回应了以下问题:在澳大利亚的城市中,优先考虑、重视、维护和拥抱自然需要什么样的转变?我们采用任务框架作为组织框架,提出将澳大利亚城市转变为未来自然积极场所的建议途径。我们提出了三条相互关联的路径,作为指导澳大利亚城市规划、政策和治理的起始行动:首先,城市需要建立基于证据的城市自然规划,并将保护和突出城市自然的新规划工具纳入主流。其次,协同规划需要成为城市的标准做法,城市的包容性自然治理需要优先考虑土著知识体系和实践,并超越地方政府的能力范围。第三,为了向自然积极型城市发展,最重要的是让澳大利亚城市的社区能够与自然一起创新。虽然我们关注的是澳大利亚的城市,但这些经验教训和途径在全球范围内广泛适用,可以激发COP15后生物多样性和COP26气候变化实施进程的科学政策辩论。
Australia is experiencing mounting pressures related to processes of urbanisation, biodiversity loss and climate change felt at large in cities. At the same time, it is cities that can take the leading role in pioneering approaches and solutions to respond to those coupling emergencies. In this perspective piece we respond to the following question: What are the required transformations for prioritising, valuing, maintaining and embracing nature in cities in Australia? We adopt the mission framework as an organising framework to present proposed pathways to transform Australian cities as nature-positive places of the future. We propose three interconnected pathways as starting actions to steer urban planning, policy and governance in Australian cities: First, cities need to establish evidence-based planning for nature in cities and mainstream new planning tools that safeguard and foreground urban nature. Second, collaborative planning needs to become a standard practice in cities and inclusive governance for nature in cities needs to prioritise Aboriginal knowledge systems and practices as well as look beyond what local governments can do. Third, for progressing to nature-positive cities, it is paramount to empower communities to innovate with nature across Australian cities. Whilst we focus on Australian cities, the lessons and pathways are broadly applicably globally and can inspire science-policy debates for the post COP15 biodiversity and COP26 climate change implementation processes.
DOI: 10.1177/0309133312461032
发表时间: 2013-02-01
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Coutts, Andrew M.;Tapper, Nigel J.;Demuzere, Matthias
通讯作者: Demuzere, Matthias
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127483
发表时间: 2022-03
影响因子: 6.4
作者:
Egerer M;Lin B;Kingsley J;Marsh P;Diekmann L;Ossola A
通讯作者: Ossola A
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898
发表时间: 2021-01-01
期刊: LAND USE POLICY
影响因子: 7.1
作者:
Almenar, Javier Babi;Elliot, Thomas;Geneletti, Davide
通讯作者: Geneletti, Davide
DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.015
发表时间: 2020-06-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Bush, Judy
通讯作者: Bush, Judy
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-210082
发表时间: 2018-05-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Buse, Chris G.;Oestreicher, Jordan Sky;Parkes, Margot
通讯作者: Parkes, Margot