Connecting Theory to Practice: Using Self-Determination Theory To Better Understand Inclusion in STEM
Connecting Theory to Practice: Using Self-Determination Theory To Better Understand Inclusion in STEM
复制标题
理论与实践相结合:利用自决理论更好地理解 STEM 的包容性
DOI:
10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1955
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Caporale, Natalia
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moore, Michael E.;Vega, Dulce M.;Wiens, Katie M.;Caporale, Natalia
In the United States, persistence for women and ethnic minorities in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers is strongly impacted by affective factors such as science identity, agency, and sense of belonging. Policies aimed at increasing the diversity of the national STEM student population and workforce have recently focused on fostering inclusive learning environments that can positively impact the experiences of underrepresented minorities (URMs) in STEM, thus increasing their retention. While research on inclusion in STEM in higher education is relatively new, inclusion research has a rich history in several other disciplines. These fields have developed theoretical frameworks and validated instruments to conceptualize and assess inclusion. Self-determination theory (SDT) is a well-established theoretical framework in educational psychology that states that ones’ internal motivation is strongly correlated with the satisfaction of three specific psychological needs: autonomy, competency, and relatedness. In this paper, we introduce SDT and discuss how it relates to inclusion and to ongoing efforts to increase retention of STEM URM students in higher education environments. We argue that grounding inclusion initiatives in the SDT framework increases our understanding of the mechanisms mediating their impact, thus facilitating their reproducibility and generalizability. Finally, we describe how this theoretical framework has been adapted by the field of Industrial and Organizational Psychology to define and assess inclusion in the workplace as an example of how STEM education researchers can use this framework to promote and assess inclusion in their fields.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Khalaila, Rabia
通讯作者:
Khalaila, Rabia
DOI:
10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
CBE life sciences education
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bangera G;Brownell SE
通讯作者:
Brownell SE
DOI:
10.1187/cbe.18-03-0042
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
CBE—Life Sciences Education
影响因子:
--
作者:
Tennial, Rachel E.;Solomon, Erin D.;Hammonds-Odie, Latanya;McDowell, Gary S.;Moore, Michael;Roca, Alberto I.;Marcette, Jana
通讯作者:
Marcette, Jana
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Christian Förtsch;Sonja Werner;Tobias Dorfner;L. Kotzebue;B. Neuhaus
通讯作者:
B. Neuhaus
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Ertl B;Luttenberger S;Paechter M
通讯作者:
Paechter M