Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model.
Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph17207594
复制
发表时间：
2020-10-19
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Pereira B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dutheil F;Charkhabi M;Ravoux H;Brousse G;Dewavrin S;Cornet T;Mondillon L;Han S;Pfabigan D;S Baker J;Mermillod M;Schmidt J;Moustafa F;Pereira B
研究目的：工作成瘾风险是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题，具有潜在的有害健康后果。对工作的感知（工作要求和工作控制）可能在引发员工工作成瘾风险方面发挥重要作用。我们的目的是利用工作需求-控制模型的框架来探讨工作成瘾风险与健康相关结果之间的联系。方法：数据收集自1580名法国员工中的187名（11.8%），他们同意使用WittyFit软件在线平台参与横断面研究。问卷包括Karasek工作内容问卷、工作成瘾风险测试、医院焦虑抑郁量表和社会人口统计。数据分析：使用Stata软件（版本13）进行统计分析。结果：工作需求强的工作成瘾高危人群比工作需求低的工作成瘾高危人群多5倍（29.8%比6.8%,p = 0.002）。工作成瘾与工作控制无关（p = 0.77），也与社会支持无关（p = 0.22）。我们发现，2.6%的低压力工人、15.0%的被动工人、28.9%的主动工人和33.3%的高压力工人有很高的工作成瘾风险（p = 0.010）。抑郁症评分≥11分的员工是低风险员工的两倍（41.5% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.009）。工作成瘾高风险员工的睡眠质量低于工作成瘾低风险员工（44.0±27.3比64.4±26.8,p < 0.001）。与低风险员工相比，工作成瘾高风险员工表现出更大的工作压力（68.4±23.2比47.5±25.1）和更低的幸福感（69.7±18.3比49.3±23.0）（p < 0.001）。结论：高工作要求与工作成瘾风险密切相关。工作成瘾的风险与更严重的抑郁和睡眠质量差有关。预防策略应该受益于识别更容易有工作成瘾风险的工人。
Purpose of the study: Work addiction risk is a growing public health concern with potential deleterious health-related outcomes. Perception of work (job demands and job control) may play a major role in provoking the risk of work addiction in employees. We aimed to explore the link between work addiction risk and health-related outcomes using the framework of job-demand-control model. Methods: Data were collected from 187 out of 1580 (11.8%) French workers who agreed to participate in a cross-sectional study using the WittyFit software online platform. The self-administered questionnaires were the Job Content Questionnaire by Karasek, the Work Addiction Risk Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and socio-demographics. Data Analysis: Statistical analyses were performed using the Stata software (version 13). Results: There were five times more workers with a high risk of work addiction among those with strong job demands than in those with low job demands (29.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.002). Addiction to work was not linked to job control (p = 0.77), nor with social support (p = 0.22). We demonstrated a high risk of work addiction in 2.6% of low-strain workers, in 15.0% of passive workers, in 28.9% of active workers, and in 33.3% of high-strain workers (p = 0.010). There were twice as many workers with a HAD-Depression score ≥11 compared with workers at low risk (41.5% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.009). Sleep quality was lower in workers with a high risk of work addiction compared with workers with a low risk of work addiction (44.0 ± 27.3 vs. 64.4 ± 26.8, p < 0.001). Workers with a high risk of work addiction exhibited greater stress at work (68.4 ± 23.2 vs. 47.5 ± 25.1) and lower well-being (69.7 ± 18.3 vs. 49.3 ± 23.0) compared with workers at low risk (p < 0.001). Conclusions: High job demands are strongly associated with the risk of work addiction. Work addiction risk is associated with greater depression and poor quality of sleep. Preventive strategies should benefit from identifying more vulnerable workers to work addiction risk.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Andreassen CS
通讯作者：
Andreassen CS
DOI：
10.1080/10803548.2012.11076910
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Bartczak, Monika;Oginska-Bulik, Nina
通讯作者：
Oginska-Bulik, Nina
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Beiler-May, Angela;Williamson, Rachel L.;Carter, Nathan T.
通讯作者：
Carter, Nathan T.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Dutheil, Frederic;Pereira, Bruno;Lambert, Celine
通讯作者：
Lambert, Celine
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Kanai, A;Wakabayashi, M;Fling, S
通讯作者：
Fling, S