Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.
Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.
复制标题
小切口角膜基质透镜摘除术与飞秒LASIK治疗近视的干眼和角膜敏感性比较。
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0077797
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Zhou X
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li M;Zhao J;Shen Y;Li T;He L;Xu H;Yu Y;Zhou X
To investigate the changes in dry eye symptoms and clinical signs and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (femto-LASIK). Prospective, non-randomized comparative study. The study included a total of 71 eyes of 71 patients; the SMILE group comprised 38 eyes of 38 patients, and the femto-LASIK group comprised 33 eyes of 33 patients. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Tear film breakup time (TBUT), the Schirmer test without anesthesia (S1T), corneal fluorescein staining, and central corneal sensation were evaluated before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. OSDI scores in both groups were increased immediately and returned to preoperative level at 1 month after surgeries. The TBUT values in both groups were reduced after surgeries relative to their preoperative scores. Patients in SMILE group were less likely to have corneal staining compared with those in the femto-LASIK group ([odds ratio] OR = 0.50, 95% [confidence interval] CI 0.28 to 0.93, P = 0.03). Central corneal sensitivity was decreased at all postoperative time points in both groups. However, the central corneal sensation scores in the SMILE group were greater than that in the femto-LASIK group at all of the postoperative time points (all P<0.05). SMILE surgeries resulted in a short-term increase in dry eye symptoms, tear film instability, and loss of corneal sensitivity. Furthermore, SMILE surgeries have superiority over femto-LASIK in lower risk of postoperative corneal staining and less reduction of corneal sensation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Chen, Feng;Wang, Jianhua;Lu, Fan
通讯作者:
Lu, Fan
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Mian, Shahzad I.;Li, Amy Y.;Shtein, Roni M.
通讯作者:
Shtein, Roni M.
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Mian, Shahzad I.;Shtein, Roni M.;Musch, David C.
通讯作者:
Musch, David C.
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Wilson, SE
通讯作者:
Wilson, SE
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Golas, Liliya;Manche, Edward E.
通讯作者:
Manche, Edward E.