Talking with Vultures

Talking with Vultures
复制标题

与秃鹫交谈

DOI:
10.1093/mind/fzw066
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Ferrari F
Ferrari F
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ferrari F

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在该书首次出版时,出版商为赫尔曼·卡佩伦和约翰·霍桑的书所做的广告宣称相对主义是“目前哲学界最热门的话题”。也许这是一种商业许可,但不可否认的是,将相对主义重新定义为一种不是思辨形而上学的论点,而是描述性语义理论的论点所引发的争论一直很激烈,并引起了很多关注。在这些辩论中,相对主义被理解为这样一种主张:至少在某些特定的话语领域中——在最近的文献中,相对主义的情况被认为是关于每一个认知的“可能”和“可能”、知识、品味、指示性条件、概率陈述和未来偶然事件的话语——我们通过允许断言的真值来获得我们实际语言实践的最佳理论特征
At the time of its first publication, relativism was proclaimed by the publisher’s advertisement for Herman Cappelen and John Hawthorne’s book to be ‘currently the hottest topic in philosophy’. Maybe that was commercial license but there is no denying that the debates provoked by the reinvention of relativism as a thesis not of speculative metaphysics but of descriptive semantic theory1 have been intense and have attracted much attention. Relativism, as understood in these debates, is the claim that, for at least certain distinguished regions of discourse—in the recent literature, the relativistic case has been argued for discourses concerning each of epistemic ‘mights’ and ‘coulds’, knowledge, taste, indicative conditionals, probability statements, and future contingents2—we obtain the best theoretical characterisation of our actual linguistic practice by allowing that the truth-value of an assertion
直觉主义、实在论、相对主义和大黄
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288878.003.0003
发表时间: 2006
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
C. Wright
通讯作者: C. Wright
索引语境主义和分歧带来的挑战
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9621-1
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 1.3
作者:
Carleigh Baker
通讯作者: Carleigh Baker
喜剧有一些有趣的地方:完美分歧的案例研究
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-013-9446-3
发表时间: 2014
期刊: Erkenntnis
影响因子: 0.9
作者:
A. Egan
通讯作者: A. Egan
心理因果关系、多重实现和涌现:简介
DOI: 10.1163/18756735-90000772
发表时间: 2002
期刊: Grazer Philosophische Studien
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Slors;S. Walter
通讯作者: S. Walter
上下文依赖、分歧和个人品味的谓词*
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
发表时间: 2005
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Peter Lasersohn
通讯作者: Peter Lasersohn