Comparative study of pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in canine teeth.
Comparative study of pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in canine teeth.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.011
复制
发表时间:
2021-10
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Song JS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kwon W;Kim IH;Kang CM;Kim B;Shin Y;Song JS
ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex are widely used for pulp treatment of primary tooth. The aim of this study was to compare the pulpal responses to ProRoot MTA, Vitapex, and Metapex in a canine model of pulpotomy. Pulpotomy procedure was performed to 34 teeth (21 incisors and 13 premolars) and ProRoot MTA, Vitapex or Metapex was applicated to artificially exposed pulp tissues. After 13 weeks, the teeth were extracted and processed with hematoxylin-eosin staining for histologic evaluation. All specimens were evaluated in several categorys related to calcific barrier, inflammatory responses and the area of calcific barrier formation was measured. Most of the specimens in the ProRoot MTA group developed a calcific barrier at the pulp amputation site and showed a low level of inflammatory response. However, in comparison to ProRoot MTA group, a small amount of calcific barrier formed in Vitapex and Metapex groups. This in vivo study found that Vitapex and Metapex induced similar pulpal responses but showed poor outcomes compared with using ProRoot MTA. Vitapex and Metapex are therefore not good substitutes for ProRoot MTA in direct pulp capping and pulpotomy.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/0030-4220(82)90220-1
发表时间:
1982-01-01
影响因子:
--
作者:
MANHART, MJ
通讯作者:
MANHART, MJ
DOI:
10.1016/0030-4220(72)90348-9
发表时间:
1972-01-01
影响因子:
--
作者:
DAVIS, SR;BRAYTON, SM;GOLDMAN, M
通讯作者:
GOLDMAN, M
DOI:
10.1590/s1678-77572006000100007
发表时间:
2006-01
期刊:
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
影响因子:
--
作者:
Estrela C;Estrela CR;Hollanda AC;Decurcio Dde A;Pécora JD
通讯作者:
Pécora JD
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Lee, Haewon;Shin, Yooseok;Song, Je Seon
通讯作者:
Song, Je Seon
影响因子:
5
作者:
Murray, PE;Hafez, AA;Cox, CF
通讯作者:
Cox, CF