Local Fibrinolytic Therapy for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled trials.
Local Fibrinolytic Therapy for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled trials.
复制标题
脑室内出血的局部纤溶治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.135
复制
发表时间:
2017-11
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Selim M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang D;Liu J;Norton C;Liu M;Selim M
The safety and efficacy of intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) in intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) patients are unclear. We aimed to determine these issues and to evaluate whether there are differences between rt-PA and urokinase according to subgroup analyses. Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in IVH patients comparing the administration of rt-PA or urokinase through extraventricular drainage (EVD) with normal saline through EVD or EVD placement alone. Six RCTs involving 607 IVH patients were included; 2 trials investigated urokinase and 4 rt-PA. IVF reduced death from any cause at the end of follow-up (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.83), which was mostly driven by rt-PA (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86). Urokinase did not reduce mortality (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.53). However, rt-PA did not reduce the proportion of survivors with poor functional outcome (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.77), or the composite endpoint of death and poor functional outcome (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.11). IVF neither reduced the need for shunt placement (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.49) nor increased ventriculitis (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.93) and rebleeding (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.45). Although the use of IVF in IVH patients appears generally safe, its benefit is limited to a reduction in mortality at the expense of an increased number of survivors with moderately severe to severe disability. Subgroup analyses do not suggest an advantage of IVF with urokinase over rt-PA.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.3
作者:
Naff N;Williams MA;Keyl PM;Tuhrim S;Bullock MR;Mayer SA;Coplin W;Narayan R;Haines S;Cruz-Flores S;Zuccarello M;Brock D;Awad I;Ziai WC;Marmarou A;Rhoney D;McBee N;Lane K;Hanley DF Jr
通讯作者:
Hanley DF Jr
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
LeBlanc RH 3rd;Chen R;Selim MH;Hanafy KA
通讯作者:
Hanafy KA
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Naff, NJ;Hanley, DF;Schmutzhard, E
通讯作者:
Schmutzhard, E
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
AKDEMIR, H;SELCUKLU, A;KAVUNCU, I
通讯作者:
KAVUNCU, I
影响因子:
2
作者:
King, Nicolas K. K.;Lai, Jin Li;Wang, Ernest
通讯作者:
Wang, Ernest