The Centralisation of Parliamentary Policy Statements in Western European Parliaments

The Centralisation of Parliamentary Policy Statements in Western European Parliaments
复制标题

西欧议会议会政策声明的集中化

DOI:
10.1080/01402382.2015.1045318
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Julia F.
Julia F.
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Julia F.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

国会议员和他们的政党团体可以使用许多不同的工具向选民传达政策声明(全体会议辩论、委员会报告的陈述、口头提问、书面提问和质询)。因此,应在一个共同框架内分析这些文书的设计。本文旨在通过绘制和解释所有西欧国家议会制度下议会政策声明的集中化,为实现这一目标迈出第一步。有人认为,在理论层面上,有两个不同的原因,一个更强或更弱的集中的工具,议会政策声明:选举联系和效率。从经验上看,国家内部和国家之间的集中化存在显著差异,值得进一步探讨。此外,统计模型的结果表明,选举联系是议会政策声明工具集中化背后的驱动因素。
Parliamentarians and their party groups can employ many different instruments to communicate policy statements to their electorate (debates in plenary, presentations of committee reports, oral questions, written questions, and interpellations). Therefore, the design of these instruments should be analysed in one common framework. This paper seeks to provide a first step towards this goal by mapping and explaining the centralisation of parliamentary policy statements in all western European countries with a parliamentary system. It is argued that, on a theoretical level, there are two different causes for a stronger or weaker centralisation of the instruments of parliamentary policy statements: the electoral connection and efficiency. Empirically, it is shown that there are striking differences in centralisation both within and between countries which are worth exploring further. Moreover, the results of the statistical models suggest that the electoral connection is the driving factor behind the centralisation of the instruments of parliamentary policy statements.
DOI: 10.2307/1953331
发表时间: 1968
影响因子: 6.8
作者:
N. Polsby
通讯作者: N. Polsby
改革议会游戏规则:衡量和解释 1945 年至 2010 年奥地利、德国和瑞士议会规则的变化
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.591079
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Ulrich Sieberer;W. Müller;M. Heller
通讯作者: M. Heller
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Jefferson
通讯作者: T. Jefferson
国会如何演变:制度变革的社会基础
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
John W. Malsberger
通讯作者: John W. Malsberger
混合成员选举制度中的相互作用效应
DOI: 10.1177/001041402237505
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 5
作者:
K. Cox;Leonard J. Schoppa
通讯作者: Leonard J. Schoppa