Agreement and precision of wide and cube scan measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain OCT in normal and glaucoma eyes.
Agreement and precision of wide and cube scan measurements between swept-source and spectral-domain OCT in normal and glaucoma eyes.
复制标题
在正常和青光眼眼睛中，扫除源和光谱域OCT之间的宽和立方体扫描测量的一致性和精度。
DOI：
10.1038/s41598-023-43230-7
复制
发表时间：
2023-09-23
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Weinreb, Robert N.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hou, Huiyuan;EI-Nimri, Nevin W.;Durbin, Mary K.;Arias, Juan D.;Moghimi, Sasan;Weinreb, Robert N.
本研究旨在评价扫频源光学相干断层扫描（SS-OCT）Triton和谱域OCT（SD-OCT）Maestro在正常/青光眼眼中的宽扫描测量结果的一致性，并评估两种器械的宽扫描和立方体扫描测量结果的精度。通过配对三名操作员创建三名Triton和三名Maestro操作员/器械配置，研究眼和测试顺序随机化。对25只正常眼和25只青光眼眼进行了3次广角扫描（12 mm × 9 mm）、黄斑立方体扫描（7 mm × 7 mm-Triton; 6 mm × 6 mm-Maestro）和视盘立方体扫描（6 mm × 6 mm）。参数测量包括视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层（cpRNFL）、神经节细胞层+内网状层（GCL+）和神经节细胞复合体（GCL++）。采用双向随机效应方差分析模型估计重复性和重现性;通过Bland-Altman分析和德明回归评价一致性。对于所有厚度测量，精度估计值较低，表明精度较高，其中黄斑的大多数限值< 5 µm，视盘的大多数限值< 10 µm。Wide和Cube扫描的精度相当。两种设备在宽扫描方面具有很好的一致性，所有测量的平均差异< 3 µm（cpRNFL < 3 µm，GCL+ < 2 µm，GCL ++ < 1 µm），表明具有互操作性。覆盖视乳头周围和黄斑区的单次广角扫描可能有助于青光眼的诊断和治疗。
This study aimed to evaluate agreement of Wide scan measurements from swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) Triton and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) Maestro in normal/glaucoma eyes, and to assess the precision of measurements from Wide and Cube scans of both devices. Three Triton and three Maestro operator/device configurations were created by pairing three operators, with study eye and testing order randomized. Three scans were captured for Wide (12 mm × 9 mm), Macular Cube (7 mm × 7 mm–Triton; 6 mm × 6 mm-Maestro), and Optic Disc Cube (6 mm × 6 mm) scans for 25 normal eyes and 25 glaucoma eyes. Parameter measurements included circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(cpRNFL), ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (GCL+), and ganglion cell complex (GCL++). A two-way random effect analysis of variance model was used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility; agreement was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis and Deming regression. The precision estimates were low, indicating high precision, for all thickness measurements with the majority of the limits < 5 µm for the macula and < 10 µm for the optic disc. Precision of the Wide and Cube scans were comparable. Excellent agreement between the two devices was found for Wide scans, with the mean difference < 3 µm across all measurements (cpRNFL < 3 µm, GCL+ < 2 µm, GCL ++ < 1 µm), indicating interoperability. A single Wide scan covering the peripapillary and macular regions may be useful for glaucoma diagnosis and management.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1001/jama.2014.3192
发表时间：
2014-05-14
期刊：
JAMA
影响因子：
--
作者：
Weinreb RN;Aung T;Medeiros FA
通讯作者：
Medeiros FA
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Matlach, Juliane;Wagner, Martin;Goebel, Winfried
通讯作者：
Goebel, Winfried
影响因子：
17.8
作者：
Hood DC;Raza AS;de Moraes CG;Liebmann JM;Ritch R
通讯作者：
Ritch R
影响因子：
8.1
作者：
Traynis, Ilana;De Moraes, Carlos G.;Hood, Donald C.
通讯作者：
Hood, Donald C.
影响因子：
2
作者：
Lee, Sang Yeop;Bae, Hyoung Won;Kim, Chan Yun
通讯作者：
Kim, Chan Yun