Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/ije/dyx206
复制
发表时间:
2018-02-01
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Davey Smith G
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Munafò MR;Tilling K;Taylor AE;Evans DM;Davey Smith G
Large-scale cross-sectional and cohort studies have transformed our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of health outcomes. However, the representativeness of these samples may be limited–either through selection into studies, or by attrition from studies over time. Here we explore the potential impact of this selection bias on results obtained from these studies, from the perspective that this amounts to conditioning on a collider (i.e. a form of collider bias). Whereas it is acknowledged that selection bias will have a strong effect on representativeness and prevalence estimates, it is often assumed that it should not have a strong impact on estimates of associations. We argue that because selection can induce collider bias (which occurs when two variables independently influence a third variable, and that third variable is conditioned upon), selection can lead to substantially biased estimates of associations. In particular, selection related to phenotypes can bias associations with genetic variants associated with those phenotypes. In simulations, we show that even modest influences on selection into, or attrition from, a study can generate biased and potentially misleading estimates of both phenotypic and genotypic associations. Our results highlight the value of knowing which population your study sample is representative of. If the factors influencing selection and attrition are known, they can be adjusted for. For example, having DNA available on most participants in a birth cohort study offers the possibility of investigating the extent to which polygenic scores predict subsequent participation, which in turn would enable sensitivity analyses of the extent to which bias might distort estimates.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Lee, S. H.;Yang, J.;Wray, N. R.
通讯作者:
Wray, N. R.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Evans, David M.;Visscher, Peter M.;Wray, Naomi R.
通讯作者:
Wray, Naomi R.
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
Elwert F;Winship C
通讯作者:
Winship C
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Bulik-Sullivan B;Finucane HK;Anttila V;Gusev A;Day FR;Loh PR;ReproGen Consortium;Psychiatric Genomics Consortium;Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3;Duncan L;Perry JR;Patterson N;Robinson EB;Daly MJ;Price AL;Neale BM
通讯作者:
Neale BM
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Hernán, MA;Hernández-Díaz, S;Robins, JM
通讯作者:
Robins, JM