Earlier Effects Are More Often Perceived as One’s Own Action Effects
Earlier Effects Are More Often Perceived as One’s Own Action Effects
复制标题
早期的影响比自己的行动影响更容易被感知
DOI：
10.1163/22134468-00002091
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kiesel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thomaschke;Kiesel
当我们的环境发生变化时，我们通常知道这些变化是否是由我们的行为引起的。然而，这种对变化的作者感-所谓的代理感（SoA）-取决于行动和结果变化之间的时间关系（即，效果）。更准确地说，SoA可能取决于效果是否在时间上可预测，以及动作和效果之间的延迟时间。在以前的研究中，SoA被明确地测量，要求对外部刺激的感知控制，或者通过测量特征性的时间判断偏差（故意约束，即，动作和效果之间的感知间隔的缩短）。我们使用了一种新的范式来更直接地调查外显SoA，方法是在强迫选择范式中询问参与者，他们的行为是否造成了时间上可预测或时间上不可预测的影响。此外，我们调查了影响的时间连续性如何影响参与者的外显SoA。在两个实验（48名参与者）中，时间可预测性对外显SoA没有影响。时间上可预测和不可预测的影响同样经常被评为自身影响。然而，较短的延迟后的效果更经常被认为是自己的效果比长时间的延迟后的效果。这些研究结果是在与以前的结果有关的影响，延迟的其他明确措施的SoA和结论，明确的SoA是更强的早期效果。
When changes occur in our environment, we usually know whether we caused these changes by our actions or not. Yet, this feeling of authorship for changes — the so-called sense of agency (SoA) — depends on the temporal relationship between action and resulting change (i.e., effect). More precisely, SoA might depend on whether the effect occurs temporally predictable, and on the duration of the delay between action and effect. In previous studies, SoA was measured either explicitly, asking for the perceived control over external stimuli, or implicitly by measuring a characteristic temporal judgement bias (intentional binding, i.e., a shortening of the perceived interval between action and effect). We used a novel paradigm for investigating explicit SoA more directly by asking participants in a forced-choice paradigm whether they caused a temporally predictable or a temporally unpredictable effect by their action. Additionally, we investigated how the temporal contiguity of the effects influenced the participants’ explicit SoA. In two experiments (48 participants each), there was no influence of temporal predictability on explicit SoA. Temporally predictable and unpredictable effects were equally often rated as own effects. Yet, effects after shorter delays were more often perceived as own effects than effects after longer delays. These findings are in line with previous results concerning the influence of effect delay on other explicit measures of SoA and concluding that explicit SoA is stronger for early effects.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Haering C;Kiesel A
通讯作者：
Kiesel A
感知和行动的常见机制：注意力和表现第十九卷
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
W. Prinz;B. Hommel
通讯作者：
B. Hommel
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Nura Sidarus;P. Haggard
通讯作者：
Nura Sidarus;P. Haggard
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Dewey, John A.;Carr, Thomas H.
通讯作者：
Carr, Thomas H.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Berberian B;Sarrazin JC;Le Blaye P;Haggard P
通讯作者：
Haggard P