Stopping in (e)motion: Reactive action inhibition when facing valence-independent emotional stimuli.

Stopping in (e)motion: Reactive action inhibition when facing valence-independent emotional stimuli.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fnbeh.2022.998714
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

情绪能够影响我们控制行为的能力。然而,目前尚不清楚情绪对动作控制是否有不利或有利的影响,以及情绪刺激的效价是否会对这种运动能力产生不同的影响。一种测量反应性抑制控制的方法是停止信号任务(SST),它通过停止信号反应时间(SSRT)来估计完全取消对停止信号呈现的反应的能力。受损以及促进行动控制已被发现时,面对情绪刺激,如停止信号在SST和混合的结果,观察到积极与消极的刺激。在这里,我们旨在更深入地调查这些悬而未决的问题。通过SST测试了60名参与者的动作控制能力,其中停止信号由恐惧和快乐的身体姿势以及它们的中性对应物表示。结果表明,积极和消极的身体姿势都增强了抑制正在进行的动作的能力。这些结果表明,情绪独立价情绪刺激促进动作控制,并表明情绪刺激可能会触发增加的感觉表征和/或注意力处理,可能会促进停止信号处理,从而提高抑制性能。
Emotions are able to impact our ability to control our behaviors. However, it is not clear whether emotions play a detrimental or an advantageous effect on action control and whether the valence of the emotional stimuli differently affects such motor abilities. One way to measure reactive inhibitory control is the stop-signal task (SST), which estimates the ability to cancel outright a response to the presentation of a stop signal by means of the stop signal reaction times (SSRT). Impaired as well as facilitated action control has been found when faced with emotional stimuli such as stop signals in SSTs and mixed results were observed for positive versus negative stimuli. Here, we aimed to investigate these unresolved issues more deeply. Action control capabilities were tested in 60 participants by means of a SST, in which the stop signals were represented by a fearful and a happy body posture together with their neutral counterpart. Results showed that both positive and negative body postures enhanced the ability to suppress an ongoing action compared to neutral body postures. These results demonstrate that emotional valence-independent emotional stimuli facilitate action control and suggest that emotional stimuli may trigger increased sensory representation and/or attentional processing that may have promote stop-signal processing and hence improved inhibitory performance.
DOI: 10.1037/h0021266
发表时间: 1966-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
LAPPIN, JS;ERIKSEN, CW
通讯作者: ERIKSEN, CW
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107541
发表时间: 2020-09-01
期刊: NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Borgomaneri, Sara;Vitale, Francesca;Avenanti, Alessio
通讯作者: Avenanti, Alessio
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0825-6
发表时间: 2015-09
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Borgomaneri S;Gazzola V;Avenanti A
通讯作者: Avenanti A
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024
发表时间: 2011-06-15
影响因子: 10.6
作者:
Aron, Adam R.
通讯作者: Aron, Adam R.
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.946263
发表时间: 2022
影响因子: 3
作者:
通讯作者: --