‘Being able to work has kept our life fairly constant:’ reconciling social practice models to assess the impact of (infra)structural inequities on household wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic
‘Being able to work has kept our life fairly constant:’ reconciling social practice models to assess the impact of (infra)structural inequities on household wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic
复制标题
– 能够工作使我们的生活保持相当稳定： – 协调社会实践模型，以评估 COVID-19 大流行期间（基础）结构性不平等对家庭福祉的影响
DOI：
10.1088/2634-4505/acc272
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shwom, Rachael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ahamed, Sonya;Schelly, Chelsea;Floress, Kristin;Lytle, William;Caggiano, Holly;Cuite, Cara L.;Wallace, Charles;Cook, Ryan;Jarvis, Rebekah;Shwom, Rachael
社会实践理论为基础设施与福祉之间的关系提供了多学科视角。实践理论中的一个著名模型将供给系统框架为能够组织社会实践的规则、资源和结构，涵盖基础设施的物质和非物质方面。第二个著名的模型根据社会实践的构成要素来构建社会实践：意义、材料和能力。协调这两个模型，我们认为，家庭应对供给体系变化以维持福祉的能力与特权和不平等的动态密切相关。为了研究这些动态，我们提出了一种新的分析工具，利用布迪厄的资本形式概念化，通过重新审视谁能够使用特定基础设施的问题来深化社会实践理论解决结构性不平等的能力。为了说明这种方法，我们研究了家庭在 COVID-19 大流行期间如何适应不断变化的供给系统。我们利用来自美国中西部 183 个家庭的数据，应用该工具来分析 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 8 月期间对包括工作、学校、食品和健康在内的多个供应系统中断的适应情况。我们强调了大流行期间特定家庭可用资本形式对家庭福祉的影响，尽管围绕预防 COVID-19 的新社会实践变得越来越政治化。这项研究深入了解了涉及家庭消费的严峻挑战和有弹性的社会实践，表明需要制定能够解决多个供给体系中的结构性不平等问题的政策。
Social practice theory offers a multidisciplinary perspective on the relationship between infrastructure and wellbeing. One prominent model in practice theory frames systems of provision as the rules, resources, and structures that enable the organization of social practices, encompassing both material and immaterial aspects of infrastructures. A second well-known model frames social practices in terms of their constituent elements: meanings, materials, and competences. Reconciling these two models, we argue that household capacity to respond to shifting systems of provision to maintain wellbeing is profoundly tied to the dynamics of privilege and inequity. To examine these dynamics, we propose a new analytical tool utilizing the Bourdieuian conceptualization of forms of capital, deepening the ability of social practice theory to address structural inequities by re-examining the question of who is able to access specific infrastructures. To illustrate this approach, we examine how households adapted to shifting systems of provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from 183 households in the Midwestern United States, we apply this tool to analyze adaptations to disruptions of multiple systems of provision, including work, school, food, and health, from February 2020 to August 2021. We highlight how household wellbeing during the pandemic has been impacted by forms of capital available to specific households, even as new social practices surrounding COVID-19 prevention became increasingly politicized. This research provides insight into both acute challenges and resilient social practices involving household consumption, indicating a need for policies that can address structural inequities across multiple systems of provision.
登录
查看更多内容
冠状病毒期间的粮食获取和安全：佛蒙特州的一项研究
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Niles;F. Bertmann;E. Morgan;Thomas Wentworth;E. Biehl;R. Neff
通讯作者：
R. Neff
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Clark, Eva;Fredricks, Karla;Weatherhead, Jill
通讯作者：
Weatherhead, Jill
超越青年文化：通过时间资本了解中年滑板者
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
P. O’Connor
通讯作者：
P. O’Connor
“什么是基础设施？它有什么作用？”：对基础设施运作的人类学视角
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lav Kanoi;V. Koh;A. Lim;Shoko Yamada;Michael R. Dove
通讯作者：
Michael R. Dove
支撑脆弱性的结构：检查小农咖啡农林复合系统中景观与社会的相互作用
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
A. Morel;M. Hirons;Sheleme Demissie;T. Gonfa;Z. Mehrabi;P. Long;S. Rifai;Tadesse Woldemariam Gole;J. Mason;C. McDermott;E. Boyd;E. Robinson;Y. Malhi;K. Norris
通讯作者：
K. Norris