A Latent Class Analysis of DUI Offender Motivation and Awareness as Predictors of Performance While on Alcohol Ignition Interlocks.

A Latent Class Analysis of DUI Offender Motivation and Awareness as Predictors of Performance While on Alcohol Ignition Interlocks.
复制标题

在酒精点火互锁的同时,对DUI罪犯动机和意识的潜在类别分析是表现的预测指标。

DOI:
10.1080/14659891.2020.1808725
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
0.8
通讯作者:
Romano E
Romano E
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scherer M;Beck K;Taylor EP;Romosz A;Voas R;Romano E

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

酒精点火联锁装置 (IID) 可降低酒后驾驶率。这种联锁为制定有针对性的干预措施提供了一个适当的时机,以培养高风险人群中饮酒与驾驶分开的习惯。这项研究确定了不同类型的 IID 用户,可以针对他们制定有针对性的干预措施。参与者 (N = 114) 在 IID 安装时接受评估,并在六个月后再次接受评估。以饮酒环境、饮酒动机、社会支持、药物使用和问题饮酒行为为指标进行潜在类别分析(LCA)。进行多变量回归分析,比较潜在类别分配与受损驾驶尝试。 LCA 支持 4 级模型,其中 14.8% 的参与者属于低使用/高认知级; 30.6%属于重度使用/高认知度类别; 30.6%属于混合用途/高认知度类别; 24.0%属于中度使用/低认知类别。处于中度使用/低意识状态的驾驶员增加了清晨 BAC 停工的情况。这些类型显示了高风险驱动因素之间的重要差异。事实上,属于适度饮酒/低意识类别的司机可能并不认为他们的酒精相关行为有问题。这些信息有助于制定有针对性的干预措施,以解决酒后驾车者的亚群体问题。
Alcohol ignition interlock devices (IID) reduce rates of drinking and driving. The interlock offers an opportune time for tailoring targeted interventions to develop habits to separate drinking from driving among this high-risk population. This study identified different types of IID users upon whom targeted interventions could be developed. Participants (N = 114) were assessed at IID installation and again six months later. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted using drinking environment, drinking motivation, social support, drug use, and problem drinking behaviors as indicators. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted comparing latent class assignment with impaired driving attempts. LCA supported a 4-class model where 14.8% of participants fell into the low use/high awareness class; 30.6% fell into the heavy use/high awareness class; 30.6% fell into the mixed use/high awareness class; and 24.0% fell into the moderate use/low awareness class. Drivers in the moderate use/low awareness condition had increased early morning BAC lockouts. These typologies demonstrate important differences within high risk drivers. Indeed, drivers who fell into the moderate use/low awareness class may not have considered their alcohol-related behaviors problematic. This information could lend itself to the development of targeted interventions to address subgroups of drinking drivers.
DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Nylund, Karen L.;Asparoutiov, Tihomir;Muthen, Bengt O.
通讯作者: Muthen, Bengt O.
DOI: 10.1007/bf01246098
发表时间: 1996-01-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Celeux, G;Soromenho, G
通讯作者: Soromenho, G
DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1749950
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 0.8
作者:
Scherer M;Marques P;Manning AR;Nochajski TH;Romano E;Taylor E;Voas R;King S
通讯作者: King S
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.002
发表时间: 2014-12
期刊: Accident; analysis and prevention
影响因子: --
作者:
Fell JC;Waehrer G;Voas RB;Auld-Owens A;Carr K;Pell K
通讯作者: Pell K
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3
发表时间: 1982-01-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
SKINNER, HA
通讯作者: SKINNER, HA