Incidental vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories: a comparison between read-aloud and free storytelling approaches

Incidental vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories: a comparison between read-aloud and free storytelling approaches
复制标题

通过听故事偶然获得词汇:朗读和自由讲故事方法之间的比较

DOI:
10.1080/01443410.2017.1363377
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Suggate
Suggate
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lenhart;Lenhard;Vaahtoranta;Suggate

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

共享书籍阅读是一种行之有效的促进词汇发展的干预措施。然而,影响其有效性的因素研究得较少,特别是在故事传递方面。我们对比了朗读和自由讲故事的方法,并测试了对词汇学习的影响。在第一项研究中,83名3至6岁的学龄前儿童在随机,单盲和平衡设计中被告知六个故事。故事要么大声朗读,要么自由讲述,并包括罕见的目标词。测量目标词习得,接受性词汇,语音工作记忆和言语理解。有一个小到中等的学习增益(d= 0.37),但没有影响的故事交付。在第二项研究中,24名最年轻的参与者和24名最年长的参与者再次接受了测试,使用相同的程序,但故事设计得更具内在激励性和年龄相适应。结果表明,可以忽略不计的词汇增益(d= 0.08)和没有影响的故事交付,除了在讲故事的儿童行为的小差异。
Shared-book reading is a well-established intervention to foster vocabulary development. Factors influencing its effectiveness are, however, less well studied, particularly with regard to story-delivery. We contrasted a read-aloud with a free storytelling approach and tested effects on vocabulary learning. In the first study, 83 preschoolers aged three to six were told six stories in a randomised, single-blind and counterbalanced design. Stories were either read aloud or told freely and included rare target-words. Measures of target-word acquisition, receptive vocabulary, phonological working memory and speech comprehension were administered. There was a small to moderate learning gain (d= .37), but no effect of story-delivery. In a second study, 24 of the youngest and 24 of the oldest participants were tested again, using the same procedure but with stories designed to be more intrinsically motivating and age-appropriate. Results indicated negligible vocabulary gains (d= .08) and no effect of story-delivery, except for small differences in child behaviour during storytelling.
DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042.58.2.103
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Luedtke, Oliver;Robitzsch, Alexander;Koeller, Olaf
通讯作者: Koeller, Olaf
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44
发表时间: 2006-02-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Biemiller, A;Boote, C
通讯作者: Boote, C
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Susanne Rott
通讯作者: Susanne Rott
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12172
发表时间: 2014-11
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Ramírez-Esparza N;García-Sierra A;Kuhl PK
通讯作者: Kuhl PK
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Trostle;S. Hicks
通讯作者: S. Hicks