Observed vs. self-reported agricultural activities: Evaluating 24-hr recall in a pilot study.
Observed vs. self-reported agricultural activities: Evaluating 24-hr recall in a pilot study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15459624.2021.2015074
复制
发表时间：
2022-02
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Friesen, Melissa C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hung, Felicia;Hofmann, Jonathan N.;Josse, Pabitra R.;Locke, Sarah J.;Stapleton, Emma M.;Andreotti, Gabriella;Deziel, Nicole C.;Freeman, Laura E. Beane;Friesen, Melissa C.
很少有研究评估工作活动自我报告的有效性，因为很难获得客观的测量方法。在本研究中，将农民对前一天农业活动的回忆与现场工作人员在空气监测期间观察到的活动进行比较。对32名农民的召回进行了评估，这些农民来自农业暴露和影响生物标志物研究，这是一项前瞻性队列研究的一个子集。这些农民在采访前一天参加了56次访问，其中包括空气监测。将14项农业活动的答案与现场工作人员在空气监测期间观察到的活动进行比较（持续时间中位数为380分钟，范围为129-486分钟）。对于每个任务，评估为是/否，计算总体一致性，敏感性，特异性和kappa。14种活动的中位患病率为观察8%，参与者13%（范围：2-54%）。一致性一般为良好至完美，中位总体一致性为95%（范围：89-100%），中位敏感性为84%(50-100%)，中位特异性为95%(88-100%)，中位kappa为0.65（0.31-1.0）。分歧的原因包括现场工作人员不在场时发生的活动（即挤奶），不明确的时间记录使得难以确定该活动是否发生在采访当天和/或前一天，定义问题（即，参与者在收获的定义中包括拖运），以及难以观察活动的细节（即干草是否发霉）。本研究为参与者在活动后准确回忆提供了支持。
Few studies have evaluated the validity of self-report of work activities because of challenges in obtaining objective measures. In this study, farmers’ recall of the previous day’s agricultural activities was compared to activities observed by field staff during air monitoring. Recall was assessed in 32 farmers from the Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect in Agriculture Study, a subset of a prospective cohort study. The farmers participated in 56 visits that comprised air monitoring the day before an interview. The answers for 14 agricultural activities were compared to activities observed by field staff during air monitoring (median duration 380 minutes, range 129–486). For each task, evaluated as yes/no, overall agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa were calculated. Median prevalence of the 14 activities was 8% from observation and 13% from participants (range: 2–54%). Agreement was generally good to perfect, with a median overall agreement of 95% (range: 89–100%), median sensitivity of 84% (50–100%), median specificity of 95% (88–100%), and median kappa of 0.65 (0.31–1.0). Reasons for disagreement included activities occurring when the field staff was not present (i.e., milking cows), unclear timing notes that made it difficult to determine whether the activity occurred the day of and/or day before the interview, definition issues (i.e., participant included hauling in the definition of harvesting), and difficulty in observing details of an activity (i.e., whether hay was moldy). This study provides support for accurate participant recall the day after activities.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2
作者：
Hobson AJ;Sterling DA;Emo B;Evanoff BA;Sterling CS;Good L;Seixas N;Checkoway H;Racette BA
通讯作者：
Racette BA
DOI：
10.1080/15287394.2015.1091414
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hofmann JN;Beane Freeman LE;Lynch CF;Andreotti G;Thomas KW;Sandler DP;Savage SA;Alavanja MC
通讯作者：
Alavanja MC
DOI：
10.1007/bf00380776
发表时间：
1994-09-01
影响因子：
3
作者：
VANDERBEEK, AJ;BRAAM, ITJ;LUYTS, S
通讯作者：
LUYTS, S
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Welk, Gregory J.;Kim, Youngwon;Carriquiry, Alicia
通讯作者：
Carriquiry, Alicia
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113525
发表时间：
2020-07
影响因子：
6
作者：
Sauvé JF;Locke SJ;Josse PR;Stapleton EM;Metwali N;Altmaier RW;Andreotti G;Thorne PS;Hofmann JN;Beane Freeman LE;Friesen MC
通讯作者：
Friesen MC