Evolution of protein specificity: insights from ancestral protein reconstruction.
Evolution of protein specificity: insights from ancestral protein reconstruction.
复制标题
蛋白质特异性的进化:来自祖先蛋白质重建的见解。
DOI:
10.1016/j.sbi.2017.07.003
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
6.8
通讯作者:
Thornton,JosephW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Siddiq,MohammadA;Hochberg,GeorgKa;Thornton,JosephW
HighlightsAncestral protein reconstruction has revealed how molecular interactions evolved.Not all paralogs with distinct functions evolved from promiscuous ancestors.Some specific interactions evolved de novo by very simple genetic mechanisms.Changes in electrostatic complementarity have driven the evolution of specificity.Ancient proteins were not systematically more promiscuous than modern ones.Specific interactions between proteins and their molecular partners drive most biological processes, so understanding how these interactions evolve is an important question for biochemists and evolutionary biologists alike. It is often thought that ancestral proteins were systematically more promiscuous than modern proteins and that specificity usually evolves after gene duplication by partitioning and refining the activities of multifunctional ancestors. However, recent studies using ancestral protein reconstruction (APR) have found that ligand-specific functions in some modern protein families evolved de novo from ancestors that did not already have those functions. Further, the new specific interactions evolved by simple mechanisms, with just a few mutations changing classically recognized biochemical determinants of specificity, such as steric and electrostatic complementarity. Acquiring new specific interactions during evolution therefore appears to be neither difficult nor rare. Rather, it is likely that proteins continually gain and lose new activities over evolutionary time as mutations cause subtle but consequential changes in the shape and electrostatics of interaction interfaces. Only a few of these activities, however, are incorporated into the biological processes that contribute to fitness before they are lost to the ravages of further mutation.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.83.6.1608
发表时间:
1986-03
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
P. V. Hippel;O. Berg
通讯作者:
P. V. Hippel;O. Berg
影响因子:
13.8
作者:
Copley SD
通讯作者:
Copley SD
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Renata, Hans;Wang, Z. Jane;Arnold, Frances H.
通讯作者:
Arnold, Frances H.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1303930110
发表时间:
2013-07-09
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Harms, Michael J.;Eick, Geeta N.;Thornton, Joseph W.
通讯作者:
Thornton, Joseph W.
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Force,A;Lynch,M;Pickett,FB;Amores,A;Yan,YL;Postlethwait,J
通讯作者:
Postlethwait,J